2004 BMW R 1100S vs 2004 BMW R 1100S vs 2006 Suzuki GSX 1300R Hayabusa

Full specifications comparison • 3 motorcycles

Comparing 3 motorcycles
2004 BMW R 1100S 2004 BMW R 1100S

Sport

Engine
Two cylinder boxer
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
504.9 pounds
2004 BMW R 1100S 2004 BMW R 1100S

Sport touring

Engine
Two cylinder boxer
Power
71.4 kW / 98 hp @ 7500 rpm
Top Speed
227 km/h / 141 mph
Weight
236 kg / 520 lbs
2006 Suzuki GSX 1300R Hayabusa 2006 Suzuki GSX 1300R Hayabusa

Sport touring

Engine
Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
127.6 kW / 175 hp @ 9800 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
249 kg / 549 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year2003 - 042006
ColoursGray, Red, Gray/Mandarin, Blue-
Make ModelBMW R 1100SSuzuki GSX 1300R Hayabusa
Dimensions
Seat Heigth -Alternate (mm)845 mm-
Seat Heigth -Alternate (in.)33.3 inches-
Seat Height800 mm / 31.4 in805 mm / 31.7 in
Wheelbase1478 mm / 58.2 in1480 mm / 58.3in
Height1,160 mm / 45.7 in.1155 mm / 45.5 in
Length2,180 mm / 85.8 in.2140 mm / 84.3 in
Width895 mm / 35.2 in.740 mm / 29.1in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight229 kg / 505 lbs221.5 kg / 488.3 lbs
Fuel Capacity18 Litres / US 4.76 gal21 Litres / 5.5 US gal / 4.6 Imp gal
Wet Weight236 kg / 520 lbs249 kg / 549 lbs
Performance
Top Speed227 km/h / 141 mph-
Braking (100 km/h - 0)40.0 m / 131 ft-
Braking (60 km/h - 0)13.5 m / 44.3 ft-
Max Power71.4 kW / 98 hp @ 7500 rpm127.6 kW / 175 hp @ 9800 rpm
Max Torque97 Nm / 9.9 kgf-m / 71.5 lb-ft.@ 5750 rpm138 Nm / 14.07 kg-m / 102 lb-ft @ 7000 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.4279 HP/kg-
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.1 sec / 177.5 km/h / 110.3 mph-
Engine
Fuel ControlOHC-
Stroke4-
Displacement (ci)66.21 cubic inches-
Engine TypeTwo cylinder boxer-
Bore x Stroke (mm)99.0 x 70.5 mm-
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.9 x 2.8 inches-
Displacement (cc)1085.00 cc-
Displacement1085 cc / 66.2 cu in1298 cc / 79.2 u in
Engine DetailFour stroke, two cylinder horizontally opposed Boxer, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel SystemInjection-
Bore x Stroke99 x 70.5 mm81 x 63 mm
Compression Ratio11.3:111.0:1
Cooling SystemAir/Oil cooledLiquid cooled
Engine Oil Specification-10W/40
Fuel Consumption6.0 L/100 km / 16.6 km/l / 39.0 US mpg-
Fuel InductionBosch fuel injectionMikuni Denso Fuel Injection
Fuel Reserve4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons-
IgnitionBosch electronicElectronic
LubricationWet sumpWet sump
Spark Plug-NGK, CR9E
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System4-
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity12 V, 14 Ah (special equipment: 12V, 19 Ah)-
Drivetrain
ClutchDry, single plateWet, multiple discs, hydraulic operated
Final DriveShaft drive (cardan)#530 chain
Gear Ratios1st 2.050 / 2nd 1.600 / 3rd 1.270 / 4th 1.040 / 5th 0.900 / 6th 0.800-
Gearbox6-speed-
Transmission / Drive6 Speed6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeThree section composite frame consisting of front & rear section, load bearing engineTwin-spar steel
Suspension - FrontMotorrad Telelever, stanchion diameter 35mm, central strut, rebound damping adjustable.Inverted telescopic, coil spring, fully adjustable spring preload, rebound and compression damping
Suspension - RearParalever, central strut, spring preload adjustable to continuously variable levels by mean of a hydraulic handwheel, rebound adjustable damping.Link-type, gas/oil damped, fully adjustable spring preload, compression damping, and rebound damping
Rake-24.2°
Trail-98 mm / 3.8 in
Wheel Travel - Front110 mm / 4.3 in.120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear130 mm / 5.1 in.140 mm / 5.5 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.9 inches-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)276 mm-
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm-
Brakes - Front2 x 320mm discs, 4 piston calipers2 x 320mm Discs, 6 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 276mm disc, 2 piston caliperSingle 240mm disc, 2 piston caliper
Rims - Front3.50 x 17"-
Rims - Rear5.00 x 17" (special equipment: 5.50 x 17")-
Tyres - Front120/70-ZR17120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear160/60-ZR18190/50 ZR17
Wheel Ratio - Rear1:2.81-
WheelsDie cast aluminium wheels-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2004 BMW R 1100S

The 2004 BMW R 1100S edges out the 2004 BMW R 1100S thanks to its lower seat height, liquid cooling, higher rear wheel travel, higher front wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2004 BMW R 1100S - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2004 BMW R 1100S matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2004 BMW R 1100S - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 805 mm vs 860 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • Larger displacement: 1298 cc vs 1085 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More rear wheel travel: 140 mm vs 130 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 120 mm vs 110 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2004 BMW R 1100S vs 2004 BMW R 1100S - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2004 BMW R 1100S and 2004 BMW R 1100S?
The 2004 BMW R 1100S uses Two cylinder boxer, while the 2004 BMW R 1100S is powered by Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2004 BMW R 1100S or the 2004 BMW R 1100S?
The 2004 BMW R 1100S has the lower seat at 805 mm, making it more accessible. The 2004 BMW R 1100S sits higher at 860 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2004 BMW R 1100S or the 2004 BMW R 1100S?
Both are strong choices. The 2004 BMW R 1100S has its own strengths, while the 2004 BMW R 1100S stands out for lower seat height and liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.