2002 BMW R 1150GS vs 2006 KTM 950 Adventure

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2002 BMW R 1150GS 2002 BMW R 1150GS

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Two cylinder boxer
Power
62.5 kW / 85 hp @ 6750 rpm (rear tyre 58.9 kW / 79 hp @ 6750 rpm)
Top Speed
195.0 km/h
Weight
249 kg / 549 lbs
2006 KTM 950 Adventure 2006 KTM 950 Adventure

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Four stroke, 75°V-twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
98 hp / 71.4 kW @ 8000 rpm
Top Speed
139.9 mph / 225 km/h
Weight
198 kg / 426.5 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year20022005 - 06
Make ModelBMW R 1150GSKTM 950 Adventure
Dimensions
Seat Height850 mm / 33.5 in880 mm / 34.6 in
Wheelbase1,501 mm / 59.1 in1570 mm / 61.8 in
Ground Clearance-316 mm / 12.4 in
Height1,435 mm / 56.5 in-
Length2180 mm / 85.8 in-
Width980 mm / 38.6 in950 mm / 37.4 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight228 kg / 503 lbs198 kg / 426.5 lbs
Fuel Capacity22 Litres / 5.8 US gal22 Litres / 5.8 gal
Wet Weight249 kg / 549 lbs-
Performance
Top Speed193.1 km/h / 120 mph139.9 mph / 225 km/h
Max Power62.5 kW / 85 hp @ 6750 rpm (rear tyre 58.9 kW / 79 hp @ 6750 rpm)98 hp / 71.4 kW @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque98 Nm / 10.0 kgf-m / 71 lb-ft @ 5250 rpm95 Nm / 70.1 lb-ft @ 6500 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.3414 HP/kg-
Standing Start ¼ Mile13.3 sec / 160.8 km/h / 99.9 mph12.1 sec / 115 mph
Engine
Engine TypeTwo cylinder boxer-
Stroke4-
Displacement1130 cc / 69 cu in942 cc / 57.4 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, two cylinder horizontally opposed Boxer, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, 75°V-twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Bore x Stroke101 x 70.5 mm100 x 60 mm
Compression Ratio10.3:111.5:1
Cooling SystemAir/Oil cooledLiquid cooling
Engine Oil Specification-Synthetic, 15w-50
Fuel Consumption5.7 L/100 km / 17.5 km/l / 41.2 US mpg39.8 mpg
Fuel InductionBosch Motronic MA 2.4 Fuel injectionConstant-pressure carburetor Ø 43mm
Fuel Reserve4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons-
IgnitionElectronic ignition MA 2.2 Bosch MotronicDenso battery ignition
LubricationWet sumpPressure lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps
Spark Plug-NGK, NGK CR 8 EK
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System4-
Drivetrain
ClutchSingle disc dry clutch, hydraulically operatedAdventure - Silver/Black or Orange/Black / Adventure S - Orange/Black
Final DriveShaftChain, 17-42
Gear Ratios1st 2.375 / 2nd 1.600 / 3rd 1.267 / 4th 1.038 / 5th 0.900 / 6th 0.8001st gear 35:12, 2nd gear 32:15, 3rd gear 30:18, 4th gear 27:20, 5th gear 27:2, 6th gear 26:27
Transmission / Drive6 Speed6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeThree section composite frame consisting of front & rear section, load bearing engineChromium-molybdenum tubular space frame, powder-coated
Suspension - FrontLight. Telelever with central spring strut, progressive coil spring, twin-tube gas-filled shock,WP-Upside-down 48 Multi Adjuster
Suspension - RearPatented BMW Paralever swing arm & shaft drive, single shock with variable rebound and damping adjustmentsWP - PDS with hydraulic spring preload
Rake26.2°26.6°
Trail121 mm / 4.8 in119 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Front210 mm / 8.2 in210 mm / 8.2 in
Wheel Travel - Rear220 mm / 8.6 in210 mm / 8.2 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front2 x 304mm discs, 4 piston calipers2x 300mm discs 2 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 276mm disc, 2 piston caliperSingle 240mm disc 2 piston caliper
Tyres - Front110/80 R1990/90 -21
Tyres - Rear150/70 R17150/70 -18
WheelsCross spoke wheels-
Wheels - Front2.50 x 19-
Wheels - Rear4.00 x 17-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2002 BMW R 1150GS

The 2002 BMW R 1150GS edges out the 2006 KTM 950 Adventure thanks to its lower seat height, fuel injection, dual front discs and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2002 BMW R 1150GS - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 850 mm vs 880 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • Larger displacement: 1130 cc vs 942 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.

2006 KTM 950 Adventure - Advantages

  • Lighter: 198 kg vs 249 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.

2002 BMW R 1150GS vs 2006 KTM 950 Adventure - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2002 BMW R 1150GS and 2006 KTM 950 Adventure?
The 2002 BMW R 1150GS uses Two cylinder boxer, while the 2006 KTM 950 Adventure is powered by Four stroke, 75°V-twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Which is lighter, the 2002 BMW R 1150GS or the 2006 KTM 950 Adventure?
The 2006 KTM 950 Adventure is lighter at 198 kg compared to 249 kg for the 2002 BMW R 1150GS - a difference of 51 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2002 BMW R 1150GS or the 2006 KTM 950 Adventure?
The 2002 BMW R 1150GS has the lower seat at 850 mm, making it more accessible. The 2006 KTM 950 Adventure sits higher at 880 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2002 BMW R 1150GS or the 2006 KTM 950 Adventure?
Both are strong choices. The 2002 BMW R 1150GS has the edge in lower seat height and fuel injection, while the 2006 KTM 950 Adventure stands out for lighter kerb weight and liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.