2013 BMW R 1200R vs 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 BMW R 1200R 2013 BMW R 1200R

Naked bike

Engine
Two cylinder boxer, two-stroke
Power
81 kW / 110 hp @ 7750 rpm
Top Speed
220 km/h / 137 mph
Weight
491.6 pounds
2014 Kawasaki Z 1000 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000

Naked bike

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
485.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year2013-
ColoursBlue, Beige, Black/white, SilverGolden Blazed Green/Metallic Spark Black
Make ModelBMW R 1200R-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)-125 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)-4.9 inches
Seat Height800mm / 31.5 in (Standard, OE, OA, sport seat) 830mm / 32.7 in (OE, OA, comfort seat, high) / 760mm / 29.9 in (OE, OA, seat, low) / 750mm / 29.5 in (OE, low slung)815 mm / 32.1 in.
Wheelbase1495 mm / 59.1 in1,435 mm / 56.5 in.
Height1273 mm / 50.1 in (excl. mirrors)1,055 mm / 41.5 in.
Length2145 mm / 84.4 in2,045 mm / 80.5 in.
Width906 mm / 35.6 in (incl. mirrors)790 mm / 31.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight198 kg / 436.5 lbs-
Fuel Capacity18 Litres / 4.7 US gal17.00 litres / 4.49 gallons
Wet Weight223 kg / 492 lbs220.0 kg / 485.0 lbs
Performance
Maximum RPM9000-
Top Speed220 km/h / 137 mph-
Acceleration (0-100 km/h)3.4 sec-
Acceleration (60-100 / 100-140 / 140-180 km/h)3.9 sec / 4.0 sec / 5.0 sec-
Acceleration (60-140 km/h)7.9 sec-
Max Power81 kW / 110 hp @ 7750 rpm-
Max Torque120 Nm / 12.2 kgf-m / 88 lb-ft @ 6000 rpm111.00 Nm (11.3 kgf-m or 81.9 ft.lbs) @ 11300
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.4394 HP/kg-
Standing Start 0-140 km/h6.4 sec-
Standing Start 0-200 km/h15.0 sec-
Engine
Bore x Stroke (mm)-77.0 x 56.0 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)-3.0 x 2.2 inches
Displacement (cc)-1043.00 cc
Displacement (ci)-63.64 cubic inches
Fuel ControlDOHCDOHC
Engine TypeTwo cylinder boxer, two-strokeV2, four-stroke
CO295.1 CO-
Displacement1170 cc / 71.4 cu in-
Engine DetailFour stroke, two cylinder horizontally opposed Boxer, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinderReed valve.
Fuel SystemInjection. Electronic intake pipe injection / BMS-K+ digital engine management with overrun fuel cut-off, twin-spark ignitionInjection
Bore x Stroke101 x 73 mm-
Compression Ratio11.0:111.8:1
Cooling SystemAir/Oil-cooled-
EmissionsClosed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard EU-3-
Engine LubricationDry sumpForced lubrication, wet sump
Fuel Consumption5.2 L/100 km / 19.2 km/l / 45.2 US mpg-
Fuel InductionElectronic intake manifold injection BMS-K-
Fuel Reserve3.00 litres / 0.79 gallons-
IgnitionDigital engine managementDigital
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System24
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity12 V / 14 Ah, maintenance-free-
Drivetrain
ClutchSingle disc dry clutch, hydraulically actuatedWet multi-disc, manual
Final DriveShaftChain
Gear Ratios1st 2.375 / 2nd 1.696 / 3rd 1.296 / 4th 0.065 / 5th 0.939 / 6th 0.848-
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary DriveConstant meshX-Ring Chain
Transmission / Drive6 Speed -
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel spaceframe, load-bearing engineTwin-tube, aluminium
Suspension - FrontBMW Motorrad Telelever; stanchion diameter 41 mm, central spring strut41 mm inverted fork with stepless compression and rebound damping and spring preload adjustability
Suspension - RearCast aluminium single-sided swing arm with BMW Motorrad Paralever; central spring strut, spring pre-load hydraulically adjustable (continuously variable) at handwheel, rebound damping adjustableHorizontal Back-link, gas-charged, with stepless rebound damping and preload adjustability
Rake27.1°24.5°
Steering Head Angle62.9°-
Trail119.1 mm / 4.7 in104 mm / 4.1 in.
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in-
Wheel Travel - Rear140 mm / 5.5 in-
Electrical Systems
AlternatorThree-phase alternator 720 W-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)265 mm250 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches12.2 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.4 inches9.8 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm310 mm
Brakes - Front2 x 320mm Discs, ABSDouble disc. Floating discs.
Brakes - RearSingle 265mm disc, ABSSingle disc
RimsCast aluminium wheels-
Rims - Front3.50 x 17'-
Rims - Rear5.50 x 17'-
Tyres - Front120/70-ZR 17120/70-ZR17
Tyres - Rear180/55-ZR 17190/50-ZR17
WheelsCast aluminium wheels-

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2013 BMW R 1200R and the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000 are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2013 BMW R 1200R - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2013 BMW R 1200R matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2014 Kawasaki Z 1000 - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 BMW R 1200R vs 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 BMW R 1200R and 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000?
The 2013 BMW R 1200R uses Two cylinder boxer, two-stroke, while the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000 is powered by V2, four-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2013 BMW R 1200R is a two-stroke engine while the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000 runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 BMW R 1200R or the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000?
The 2013 BMW R 1200R has the lower seat at 800mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000 sits higher at 815 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 BMW R 1200R or the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 BMW R 1200R has its own strengths, while the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000 offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.