2009 Ducati Monster 696 vs 2010 Suzuki SV 650

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2009 Ducati Monster 696 2009 Ducati Monster 696

Naked bike

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
354.9 pounds
2010 Suzuki SV 650 2010 Suzuki SV 650

Naked bike

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
370.4 pounds
Full Specifications
General
ColoursRed (red/black), Matte Black (black/black), White (black/black)Blue, Gray
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)-150 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)-5.9 inches
Seat Height770 mm / 30.3 in.800 mm / 31.5 in.
Wheelbase1,450 mm / 57.1 in.1,440 mm / 56.7 in.
Height-805 mm / 31.7 in.
Length-2,080 mm / 81.9 in.
Width-745 mm / 29.3 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight161 kg / 354.9 lbs168 kg / 370.4 lbs
Fuel Capacity15.00 litres / 3.96 gallons17.00 litres / 4.49 gallons
Performance
Max Torque50.60 Nm (5.2 kgf-m or 37.3 ft.lbs)-
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.4898 HP/kg-
Engine
Displacement (ci)42.47 cubic inches39.36 cubic inches
Fuel ControlDesmodromic valve controlDOHC
Bore x Stroke (mm)88.0 x 57.2 mm81.0 x 62.6 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.5 x 2.3 inches3.2 x 2.5 inches
Displacement (cc)696.00 cc645.00 cc
Engine TypeV2, four-strokeV2, four-stroke
Fuel SystemInjection. Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle bodyInjection
Compression Ratio10.7:111.5:1
Engine Lubrication-Wet Sump
Exhaust2 aluminium mufflers-
Ignition-Digital/Transistorized
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System24
Drivetrain
ClutchAPTC wet multiplate with hydraulic control-
Final DriveChain-
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel trellis frame-
Suspension - FrontShowa 43mm upside-down forksTelescopic, coil spring, oil damped, fully adjustable preload
Suspension - RearProgressive linkage with preload and rebound Sachs adjustable monoshockLink-type, 7-way adjustable spring preload
Rake24.0°-
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in.-
Wheel Travel - Rear148 mm / 5.8 in.-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.6 inches-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)245 mm-
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches-
Brakes - FrontDouble discDouble disc
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc
Tyres - Front120/60-ZR17120/60-ZR17
Tyres - Rear160/60-ZR17160/60-ZR17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2009 Ducati Monster 696

The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 edges out the 2010 Suzuki SV 650 thanks to its lower seat height. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2009 Ducati Monster 696 - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 770 mm vs 800 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2010 Suzuki SV 650 - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2010 Suzuki SV 650 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2009 Ducati Monster 696 vs 2010 Suzuki SV 650 - FAQs

Which is lighter, the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 or the 2010 Suzuki SV 650?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 168 kg for the 2010 Suzuki SV 650 - a difference of 7 kg. This is a small difference unlikely to be a deciding factor in everyday riding.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 or the 2010 Suzuki SV 650?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 has the lower seat at 770 mm, making it more accessible. The 2010 Suzuki SV 650 sits higher at 800 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 or the 2010 Suzuki SV 650?
Both are strong choices. The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2010 Suzuki SV 650 offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.