2009 Honda CB 1000R vs 2011 Ducati Monster 796

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles

Differences only

2009 Honda CB 1000R

Naked bike

Engine

In-line four

Power

123.4 hp / 92 kW @ 10000 rpm

Top Speed

228.6 km/h / 142.0 mph

Weight

217 kg / 478.4 lbs

2011 Ducati Monster 796

Naked bike

Engine

Four stroke, 90° °L° twin cylinder, SOHC, desmodromic 2 valves per cylinder

Power

64 kW / 87 hp @ 8250 rpm

Top Speed

200.4 km/h / 124.5 mph

Weight

187 kg / 412 lbs

Full Specifications

Differs Same

General
Year	2009	2011
Colours	Olive, gray, black, white	-
Make Model	Honda CB 1000R	Ducati Monster 796
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)	5.1 inches	-
Ground Clearance (mm)	130 mm	-
Seat Height	828 mm / 32.6 in	800 mm / 31.5 in
Wheelbase	1445 mm / 56.8 in	1450 mm / 57.1in
Ground Clearance	130 mm / 5.1 in	-
Height	2,105 mm / 82.9 in.	-
Length	2,105 mm / 82.9 in.	-
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight	217 kg / 478.4 lbs	167 kg - 369 lbs / 169 kg -373 lbs ABS version
Fuel Capacity	17 Litres / 4.5 US gal	15 L / 4.0 USgal / 3.3 Imp gal (13.5 L / 3.6 US gal / 3.0 Imp gal ABS version)
Wet Weight	217 kg / 478.4 lbs	187 kg / 412 lbs
Performance
Top Speed	228.6 km/h / 142.0 mph	200.4 km/h / 124.5 mph
Max Power	123.4 hp / 92 kW @ 10000 rpm	64 kW / 87 hp @ 8250 rpm
Max Torque	100 Nm / 73.8 lb-ft @ 8000 rpm	78.5 Nm / 8.0 kgf-m 58 lb-ft @ 6250rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio	0.5685 HP/kg	-
Standing Start ¼ Mile	11.3 sec	12.1 sec
Engine
Engine Type	In-line four	-
Fuel Control	DOHC	-
Stroke	4	-
Displacement	998 cc / 60.9 cu-in	803 cc / 49.0 cu in
Engine Detail	Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.	Four stroke, 90° °L° twin cylinder, SOHC, desmodromic 2 valves per cylinder
Fuel System	Injection. PGM-FI electronic fuel injection	-
Bore x Stroke	75 x 56.5 mm	88 x 66 mm
Compression Ratio	11.2:1	11.0:1
Cooling System	Liquid cooled	Air cooled
Exhaust	-	Lightweight 2-1-2 system with catalytic converter with twin lambda probes
Fuel Consumption	18.3 km/lit	5.2 L/100 km / 19.1 km/l . 45 US mpg / 54 Imp mpg
Fuel Induction	PGM-F1 Electronic fuel injection36mm throttle bodies	Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle body
Ignition	Computer controlled digital transistorized	Marelli electronic
Lubrication	Wet sump	-
Starter	Electric	Electric
Valve System	4	-
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity	12V/8.6AH	-
Drivetrain
Clutch	Wet, multiplate with coil springs.	APTC wet multiplate with hydraulic control
Final Drive	#530 O-ring sealed chain	Chain; front sprocket 15; rear sprocket 39
Gear Ratios	1: 2.538 (33/13) / - 2: 1.941 (33/17) / - 3: 1.579 (30/19) / - 4: 1.363 (30/22) / - 5: 1.217 (28/23) / - 6: 1.115 (29/26)	1st 32/13, 2nd 30/18, 3rd 28/21, 4th 26/23, 5th 22/22, 6th 24/26
Gearbox	6-speed	-
Primary Drive	-	Straight cut gears; ratio 1.85:1
Transmission / Drive	6 Speed	6 Speed
Chassis
Frame Type	Mono-back born coast aluminous	Tubular steel trellis
Suspension - Front	43mm Inverted HMAS cartridge type telescopic forks, with stepless reload, compression and rebound adjustable	Showa 43mm upside-down forks
Suspension - Rear	Monoshock with gas charged HMAS damper rebound adjustable	Progressive linkage with fully adjustable Sachs monoshock with piggy back aluminum swing arm
Rake	25.0°	24°
Trail	99.0mm / 3.9 in	87mm / 3.42 in
Wheel Travel - Front	120 mm / 4.7 in	120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear	128 mm / 5.0 in	148 mm / 5.8 in
Electrical Systems
Instrumentation	-	Digital unit displaying: Speedometer, rev counter, clock, scheduled maintenance warning, oil temperature, trip fuel, lap time, warning light for low oil pressure, fuel level, fuel reserve, neutral, turn signals, overrev, immobilizer. Ready for DDA system.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)	10.1 inches	-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)	310 mm	-
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)	12.2 inches	-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)	256 mm	-
Brakes - Front	2x 310mm discs 3 piston calipers	2 x 320mm Discs, 4 piston calipers
Brakes - Rear	Single 256mm disc 2 piston caliper	Single 245 mm disc, 2 piston caliper
Tyres - Front	120/70 ZR17	120/70 -ZR17
Tyres - Rear	180/50 ZR17	160/55 -ZR17
Wheels - Front	Hollow-section 4-spoke cast aluminium	-
Wheels - Rear	U-section 4-spoke cast aluminium	-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2011 Ducati Monster 796

The 2011 Ducati Monster 796 edges out the 2009 Honda CB 1000R thanks to its lighter kerb weight, lower seat height, dual front discs and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2009 Honda CB 1000R - Advantages

Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
Larger displacement: 998 cc vs 803 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.

2011 Ducati Monster 796 - Advantages

Lighter: 187 kg vs 217 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
Lower seat height: 800 mm vs 828 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
More rear wheel travel: 148 mm vs 128 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2009 Honda CB 1000R vs 2011 Ducati Monster 796 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2009 Honda CB 1000R and 2011 Ducati Monster 796?

The 2009 Honda CB 1000R uses In-line four, while the 2011 Ducati Monster 796 is powered by Four stroke, 90° °L° twin cylinder, SOHC, desmodromic 2 valves per cylinder.

Which is lighter, the 2009 Honda CB 1000R or the 2011 Ducati Monster 796?

The 2011 Ducati Monster 796 is lighter at 187 kg compared to 217 kg for the 2009 Honda CB 1000R - a difference of 30 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2009 Honda CB 1000R or the 2011 Ducati Monster 796?

The 2011 Ducati Monster 796 has the lower seat at 800 mm, making it more accessible. The 2009 Honda CB 1000R sits higher at 828 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.

Which has the larger fuel tank, the 2009 Honda CB 1000R or the 2011 Ducati Monster 796?

The 2009 Honda CB 1000R has the larger tank at approximately 17 litres vs 15 litres for the 2011 Ducati Monster 796. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 283-340 km vs 250-300 km between stops.

Which should I buy, the 2009 Honda CB 1000R or the 2011 Ducati Monster 796?

Both are strong choices. The 2009 Honda CB 1000R has the edge in larger fuel tank and liquid cooling, while the 2011 Ducati Monster 796 stands out for lighter kerb weight and lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Honda CB 1000R years All Ducati Monster 796 years

Build your own comparison →