2005 Honda CRF230F vs 2008 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2008 Yamaha WR 250F
Full specifications comparison •
3 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | - | 2007 - 08 |
| Colours | Red | - |
| Make Model | - | Yamaha WR 250F |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 297 mm | 366 mm |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 11.7 inches | 14.4 inches |
| Seat Height | 866 mm / 34.1 in. | 980 mm / 38.6 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,374 mm / 54.1 in. | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. |
| Ground Clearance | - | 335 mm / 13.2 in |
| Height | - | 1,298 mm / 51.1 in. |
| Length | - | 2,164 mm / 85.2 in. |
| Width | - | 826 mm / 32.5 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 108 kg / 238.0 lbs | 106.1 kg / 234.0 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 8.32 litres / 2.20 gallons | 7.94 litres / 2.10 gallons |
| Wet Weight | - | 129.0 kg / 284.4 lbs |
| Engine |
| Stroke | 4 | 4 |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder | Single cylinder |
| Displacement (ci) | 13.61 cubic inches | 15.26 cubic inches |
| Displacement (cc) | 223.00 cc | 250.00 cc |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 65.5 x 66.2 mm | 77.0 x 53.6 mm |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 2.6 x 2.6 inches | 3.0 x 2.1 inches |
| Fuel Control | SOHC | DOHC |
| Displacement | - | 249 cc / 15.2 cu-in |
| Engine Detail | - | Four stroke, single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valve |
| Fuel System | - | Carburettor |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 77 x 53.6 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 12.5:1 |
| Cooling System | - | Liquid cooled, |
| Fuel Induction | - | Keihin FCR-MX37 flat-slide w/throttle position sensor) |
| Ignition | CDI | Digital CDI |
| Lubrication | - | Dry sump |
| Starter | - | Electric / Kick |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Wet, multiple discs, cable operated |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Transmission / Drive | - | 5 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Aluminium Bilateral Beam |
| Suspension - Front | 37mm leading-axle Showa fork | Inverted fork |
| Suspension - Rear | Pro-Link Showa single-shock with spring-preload adjustability | Single shock |
| Rake | 27.3° | 27.0° |
| Trail | 112 mm / 4.4 in. | 115 mm / 4.5 in |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 241 mm / 9.5 in. | 300 mm / 11.8 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 229 mm / 9.0 in. | 310 mm / 12.2 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 240 mm | 250 mm |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 9.4 inches | 9.8 inches |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 9.6 inches |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 245 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc | Single disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | 80/70-21 | 80/80-M21 |
| Tyres - Rear | 100/90-18 | 100/80-M18 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2008 Yamaha WR 250F
The 2008 Yamaha WR 250F edges out the 2005 Honda CRF230F thanks to its liquid cooling, greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2005 Honda CRF230F - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 866 mm vs 980 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2008 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages
- 🌡️Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
- 🏔️More ground clearance: 335 mm vs 297 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
- 🔄More rear wheel travel: 305 mm vs 229 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
- 🔄More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 241 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.
2005 Honda CRF230F vs 2008 Yamaha WR 250F - FAQs
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2005 Honda CRF230F or the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F?
The 2005 Honda CRF230F has the lower seat at 866 mm, making it more accessible. The 2008 Yamaha WR 250F sits higher at 980 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2005 Honda CRF230F or the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F?
Both are strong choices. The 2005 Honda CRF230F has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F stands out for liquid cooling and greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.