2014 Honda CRF250R vs 2013 KTM 250 SX-F

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2014 Honda CRF250R 2014 Honda CRF250R

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
231.0 pounds
2013 KTM 250 SX-F 2013 KTM 250 SX-F

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
226.6 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsModel ID: CRF250R-
ColoursRedOrange/black
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)12.7 inches14.8 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)323 mm375 mm
Seat Height950 mm / 37.4 in.992 mm / 39.1 in.
Wheelbase1,488 mm / 58.6 in.1,495 mm / 58.9 in.
Height1,271 mm / 50.0 in.1,140 mm / 44.9 in.
Length2,191 mm / 86.3 in.2,090 mm / 82.3 in.
Width827 mm / 32.6 in.830 mm / 32.7 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)1.80 litres-
Oil Capacity (Quarts)0.12 quarts-
Dry Weight-102.8 kg / 226.6 lbs
Fuel Capacity6.28 litres / 1.66 gallons7.50 litres / 1.98 gallons
Wet Weight104.8 kg / 231.0 lbs-
Performance
Max Torque47.70 Nm (4.9 kgf-m or 35.2 ft.lbs) @ 65009.20 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000 Revolutions
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.0815 HP/kg
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.0 x 2.1 inches3.1 x 2.1 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)76.8 x 53.8 mm78.0 x 52.3 mm
Displacement (cc)249.00 cc249.91 cc
Displacement (ci)15.19 cubic inches15.25 cubic inches
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Fuel ControlSOHCSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)
Fuel SystemInjection. Dual-Timing Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI), 46mm throttle bodyCarburettor
Compression Ratio13.5:110.6:1
EmissionsMeets current California Air Resources Board (CARB) and EPA off-road emissions standards.-
Engine Lubrication-Forced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps
IgnitionFull transistor with electronic advanceContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment
StarterKickElectric
Valve System-2
Drivetrain
ClutchMulti plate wet clutchWet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Primary Drive#520 Chain; 13T/49T13:48. Primary drive: 22:68.
Chassis
Frame Type-Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing
Suspension - Front48mm inverted Showa cartridge fork with 16-position rebound and 16-position compression damping adjustabilityWP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA CC
Suspension - RearPro-Link® Showa single shock with spring preload, 17-position rebound damping adjustability, and compression-damping adjustment separated into low-speed (13 positions) and high-speed (3.5 turns); 12.3 inches travelWP ?Suspension 5018 BAVP DCC
Rake27.0°26.5°
Trail118 mm / 4.6 in.-
Wheel Travel - Front241 mm / 9.5 in.205 mm / 8.1 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear61 mm / 2.4 in.185 mm / 7.3 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)240 mm210 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.4 inches8.3 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)9.4 inches8.7 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)240 mm220 mm
Brakes - FrontDouble disc. Two-piston calipers.Single disc. Four-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.
Tyres - Front80/100-21100/80-17
Tyres - Rear100/90-19110/80-17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2014 Honda CRF250R

The 2014 Honda CRF250R edges out the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F thanks to its lower seat height, fuel injection, dual front discs and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2014 Honda CRF250R - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 950 mm vs 992 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More front wheel travel: 241 mm vs 205 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 KTM 250 SX-F - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 375 mm vs 323 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 185 mm vs 61 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2014 Honda CRF250R vs 2013 KTM 250 SX-F - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2014 Honda CRF250R or the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F?
The 2014 Honda CRF250R has the lower seat at 950 mm, making it more accessible. The 2013 KTM 250 SX-F sits higher at 992 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2014 Honda CRF250R or the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F?
Both are strong choices. The 2014 Honda CRF250R has the edge in lower seat height and fuel injection, while the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F stands out for greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.