2022 Husqvarna FC250 vs 2023 KTM 300 SX
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | White/yellow/blue | Orange/white/grey |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 14.6 inches | 13.9 inches |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 370 mm | 354 mm |
| Seat Height | 940 mm / 37.0 in. | 958 mm / 37.7 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1482 mm / 58.3 in. | 1482 mm / 58.3 in. |
| Length | 2260 mm / 89.0 in. | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 99.5 kg / 219.4 lbs | 99.4 kg / 219.1 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 7.00 litres / 1.85 US gallons | 7.20 litres / 1.90 US gallons |
| Performance |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | 0.4623 HP/kg | - |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.1 x 2.1 inches | 2.8 x 2.8 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 78.0 x 52.3 mm | 72.0 x 72.0 mm |
| Displacement (cc) | 249.9 cc | 293.2 cc |
| Displacement (ci) | 15.25 cubic inches | 17.89 cubic inches |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, four-stroke | Single cylinder, two-stroke |
| Fuel Control | Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC) | - |
| Stroke | - | 2-stroke |
| CO2 | - | 64.7 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission) |
| Fuel System | Carburettor | Injection |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 2.79 litres/100 km (35.8 km/l or 84.31 mpg) |
| Ignition | Keihin EMS | Vitesco Technologies EMS |
| Starter | Electric | Electric |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics | Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics |
| Final Drive | Chain (final drive) | Chain (final drive) |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Primary Drive | 5/8 x 1/4´ chain | X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4´ chain |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel | Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel |
| Suspension - Front | WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm | WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm |
| Suspension - Rear | WP XACT Monoshock with linkage | WP XACT Monoshock with linkage |
| Rake | 26.1° | 26.5° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 300 mm / 11.8 in. | 300 mm / 11.8 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 300 mm / 11.8 in. | 310 mm / 12.2 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc. Brembo twin-piston floating calliper | Single disc. Brembo 2-piston floating caliper |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc. Brembo single-piston floating calliper | Single disc. Brembo single-piston floating calliper, brake disc |
| Tyres - Front | 90/90-21 | 1.60-21 |
Verdict
⚖️
Too close to call
The 2022 Husqvarna FC250 and the 2023 KTM 300 SX are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.
Key Differences
2022 Husqvarna FC250 - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 940 mm vs 958 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2023 KTM 300 SX - Advantages
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
2022 Husqvarna FC250 vs 2023 KTM 300 SX - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2022 Husqvarna FC250 and 2023 KTM 300 SX?
The 2022 Husqvarna FC250 uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2023 KTM 300 SX is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2022 Husqvarna FC250 is a four-stroke engine while the 2023 KTM 300 SX runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2022 Husqvarna FC250 or the 2023 KTM 300 SX?
The 2022 Husqvarna FC250 has the lower seat at 940 mm, making it more accessible. The 2023 KTM 300 SX sits higher at 958 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2022 Husqvarna FC250 or the 2023 KTM 300 SX?
Both are strong choices. The 2022 Husqvarna FC250 has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2023 KTM 300 SX stands out for fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.