MotoSpecs

2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 vs 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 vs 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC

Full specifications comparison • 3 motorcycles

Comparing 3 motorcycles
2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650

Super motard

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
42.1 hp / 31 kW @ 7000 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
432.0 pounds
2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650

Super motard

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
432.0 pounds
2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC

Super motard

Engine
In-line three, four-stroke
Power
69.1 kW / 93.9 hp @ 9300 rpm
Top Speed
196.3 km/h / 122 mph
Weight
474.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Comments-Windscreen
Year2010 - 112013
ColoursEbony, Candy Persimmon Red, Candy Thunder BlueBlack, white, blue
Make ModelKawasaki KLR 650Triumph Tiger 800 XC
Warranty12 Months-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)211 mm160 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)8.3 inches6.3 inches
Storage-Top box, saddle bags
Seat Height889 mm / 35.0 in.810 mm -830 mm / 31.9"- 32.7" adjustable
Wheelbase1480 mm / 58.3 in1530 mm / 60.2"
Ground Clearance210 mm / 8.3 in-
Height1,349 mm / 53.1 in.1350 mm / 53.1"
Length2,296 mm / 90.4 in.2215 mm / 87.1"
Width960 mm / 37.8 in.795 mm / 31.3"
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.24 quarts
Oil Capacity (l)-3.70 litres
Dry Weight-112 kg / 246.9 lbs
Fuel Capacity21.95 litres / 5.80 gallons18.9 Litres / 5.0 US gal / 4.2 Imp gal
Wet Weight196.0 kg / 432.0 lbs214.5 kg / 473 lbs
Performance
Top Speed-196.3 km/h / 122 mph
Max Power42.1 hp / 31 kW @ 7000 rpm69.1 kW / 93.9 hp @ 9300 rpm
Max Torque47 Nm / 4.7 kgf-m @ 5000 rpm79 Nm / 8.1 kgf-m / 58 ft.lb @ 7850 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.1102 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile-12.2 sec
Engine
Displacement (cc)651.00 cc-
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeIn-line three, four-stroke
Displacement (ci)39.72 cubic inches-
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.9 x 3.3 inches-
Bore x Stroke (mm)100.0 x 83.0 mm-
Fuel ControlDOHCDOHC
CO2-133.2 CO
Displacement651 cc / 39.7 cu-in799 cc / 48.7 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, single cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Keihin CVK40Injection. Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Bore x Stroke100 x 83 mm.74 x 61.9 mm
Compression Ratio10.0:112.0:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
Exhaust-Stainless Steel, 3 into 1, high-level exhaust
Fuel Consumption-5.3 L/100 km / 18.8 km/l / 44.2 US mpg / 53 Imp mpg
Fuel InductionKeihin CVK40Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
IgnitionElectric CDIDigital CDI
Lubrication Forced lubrication (wet sump)Wet sump
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44
Drivetrain
Clutch Wet multi-disc, cable operationWet, multi-plate
Final DriveChainChain
Final Drive Ratio 2.867 (43/15)-
Gear Ratios1st 2.266 (34/15) 2nd 1.444 (26/18) 3rd 1.136 (25/22) 4th 0.954 (21/22) 5th 0.791 (19/24)-
Gearbox5-speed6-speed
Primary Drive-O ring chain
Primary Drive Ratios 2.272 / 75/33-
Transmission / Drive5 Speed 6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeSemi-double Cradle Made of high-tech, round-section, high-tensile steelTubular steel trellis frame, twin-sided swingarm
Suspension - Front41mm Air-adjustable forks,Showa 45mm upside down forks
Suspension - RearUni-Trak® linkage, 5-way preload shock absorber with 4way rebound damping.Showa monoshock with remote oil reservoir, hydraulically adjustable preload, rebound damping adjustment
Rake 28.0°23.9°
Trail112 mm / 4.4 in92.4mm / 3.6"
Wheel Travel - Front200 mm / 7.8 in220 mm / 8.7"
Wheel Travel - Rear185 mm / 7.2 in215 mm / 8.5"
Electrical Systems
Instrumentation-LCD multi-functional instrument pack with digital speedometer, trip computer, analogue tachometer, gear position indicator, fuel gauge, service indicator, switchable ABS and clock
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)11.0 inches12.1 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)200 mm255 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)7.9 inches10.0 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)280 mm308 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc2 x 308mm floating discs, Nissin 2-piston floating caliber (Switchable ABS available), Nissin front brake master cylinder, 14mm diameter
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle 255mm disc, Nissin single-piston floating caliber (Switchable ABS available)
Tyres - Front90/90-2190/90 ZR21
Tyres - Rear130/80-17150/70 ZR17
Wheels - Front-2.50 x 21" Cast aluminium rim, 36 spoke
Wheels - Rear-4.25 x 17" Cast aluminium rim, 32 spoke

Verdict

Winner on specs

2011 Kawasaki KLR 650

The 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 edges out the 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 thanks to its higher torque, lower seat height, fuel injection, dual front discs, higher rear wheel travel, higher front wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 210 mm vs 160 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.

2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 79 Nm vs 47 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Lower seat height: 810 mm -830 mm vs 889 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • Larger displacement: 799 cc vs 651 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More rear wheel travel: 215 mm vs 185 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 220 mm vs 200 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 vs 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 and 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650?
The 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 is powered by In-line three, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 or the 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650?
The 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 has the lower seat at 810 mm -830 mm, making it more accessible. The 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 sits higher at 889 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 or the 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650?
Both are strong choices. The 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 has the edge in greater ground clearance, while the 2011 Kawasaki KLR 650 stands out for higher torque and lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Kawasaki KLR 650 years All Kawasaki KLR 650 years All Triumph Tiger 800 XC years
Build your own comparison →