MotoSpecs

2010 Kawasaki KX65 vs 2013 KTM 50 SX

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2010 Kawasaki KX65 2010 Kawasaki KX65

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
60.0 kg / 132.2 lbs
2013 KTM 50 SX 2013 KTM 50 SX

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
91.5 pounds
Full Specifications
General
ColoursLime GreenOrange/black
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)12.0 inches9.9 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)305 mm252 mm
Seat Height759 mm / 29.9 in.684 mm / 26.9 in.
Wheelbase1,120 mm / 44.1 in.1,032 mm / 40.6 in.
Height955 mm / 37.6 in.1,140 mm / 44.9 in.
Length1,590 mm / 62.6 in.2,090 mm / 82.3 in.
Width759 mm / 29.9 in.830 mm / 32.7 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight-41.5 kg / 91.5 lbs
Fuel Capacity3.78 litres / 1.00 gallons2.30 litres / 0.61 gallons
Wet Weight60.0 kg / 132.2 lbs-
Performance
Max Torque-9.20 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000 Revolutions
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.0815 HP/kg
Engine
Displacement (ci)3.95 cubic inches2.99 cubic inches
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Bore x Stroke (mm)44.5 x 41.6 mm39.5 x 40.0 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)1.8 x 1.6 inches1.6 x 1.6 inches
Fuel Control-Single Overhead Cams (SOHC)
Displacement (cc)64.70 cc49.00 cc
Engine Detail-Reed intake.
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Mikuni VM24SSCarburettor
Compression Ratio8.4:110.6:1
Engine Lubrication-Mixture oil lubrication
IgnitionDigital CDISELETTRA 2p D36
Starter-Kick
Valve System-2
Drivetrain
Clutch-3-lining automatic clutch on the main shaft / centrifugal force
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed5-speed
Primary Drive-11:40. Primary drive: 33:61 straight cut spur gear.
Chassis
Frame TypeSemi-double-cradle, high-tensile steelCentral tube frame of chrome molybdenum steel tubing, powder-coated
Suspension - Front33mm leading axle conventional fork with four-way rebound damping / 8.3 in.WP ?Suspension USD ?35
Suspension - RearUNI-TRAK single shock system with four-way rebound damping and fully adjustable spring preload / 9.4WP ?Suspension ?3614 BAEM
Rake27.0°24.0°
Wheel Travel - Front-205 mm / 8.1 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear-185 mm / 7.3 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)-5.5 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)-6.3 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)-160 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)-140 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle discSingle disc. Four-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.
Tyres - Front60/100-14100/80-17
Tyres - Rear80/90-12110/80-17

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2010 Kawasaki KX65 and the 2013 KTM 50 SX are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2010 Kawasaki KX65 - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 305 mm vs 252 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.

2013 KTM 50 SX - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 684 mm vs 759 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2010 Kawasaki KX65 vs 2013 KTM 50 SX - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2010 Kawasaki KX65 or the 2013 KTM 50 SX?
The 2013 KTM 50 SX has the lower seat at 684 mm, making it more accessible. The 2010 Kawasaki KX65 sits higher at 759 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2010 Kawasaki KX65 or the 2013 KTM 50 SX?
Both are strong choices. The 2010 Kawasaki KX65 has the edge in greater ground clearance, while the 2013 KTM 50 SX stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Kawasaki KX65 years All KTM 50 SX years
Build your own comparison →