2013 Kawasaki KX65 vs 2010 Honda CRF50F
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | Lime Green | Red |
| Dimensions |
| Storage | Front and rear rack | - |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 305 mm | 147 mm |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 12.0 inches | 5.8 inches |
| Seat Height | 759 mm / 29.9 in. | 549 mm / 21.6 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,120 mm / 44.1 in. | 914 mm / 36.0 in. |
| Height | 955 mm / 37.6 in. | - |
| Length | 1,590 mm / 62.6 in. | - |
| Width | 759 mm / 29.9 in. | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Fuel Capacity | 3.79 litres / 1.00 gallons | 2.64 litres / 0.70 gallons |
| Wet Weight | 60.0 kg / 132.2 lbs | 49.9 kg / 110.0 lbs |
| Performance |
| Max Torque | 59.00 Nm (6.0 kgf-m or 43.5 ft.lbs) @ 5250 Revolutions | - |
| Engine |
| Fuel Control | Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC) | SOHC |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, two-stroke | Single cylinder, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 1.8 x 1.6 inches | 1.5 x 1.6 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 44.5 x 41.6 mm | 39.0 x 41.4 mm |
| Displacement (ci) | 3.95 cubic inches | 2.99 cubic inches |
| Displacement (cc) | 64.70 cc | 49.00 cc |
| Fuel System | Carburettor. Mikuni VM24SS | Carburettor. 13mm piston-valve carburator |
| Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Reserve | - | 0.75 litres / 0.20 gallons |
| Ignition | Digital CDI | CD |
| Starter | Electric | - |
| Valve System | 4 | - |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Automatic |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 3-speed |
| Primary Drive | 2WD / 4WD, shaft | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Semi-double-cradle, high-tensile steel | - |
| Suspension - Front | 33mm leading axle conventional fork with four-way rebound damping / 8.3 in. | Inverted telescopic fork |
| Suspension - Rear | Uni-Trak single shock system with four-way rebound damping and fully adjustable spring preload / 9.4 | Single-shock |
| Rake | 27.0° | 25.0° |
| Trail | 61 mm / 2.4 in. | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 89 mm / 3.5 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 71 mm / 2.8 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 7.9 inches | - |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 200 mm | - |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tyres - Front | 60/100-14 | 2.50-10 |
| Tyres - Rear | 80/100-12 | 2.50-10 |
Verdict
⚖️
Too close to call
The 2013 Kawasaki KX65 and the 2010 Honda CRF50F are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.
Key Differences
2013 Kawasaki KX65 - Advantages
- 🏔️More ground clearance: 305 mm vs 147 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
2010 Honda CRF50F - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 549 mm vs 759 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2013 Kawasaki KX65 vs 2010 Honda CRF50F - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2013 Kawasaki KX65 and 2010 Honda CRF50F?
The 2013 Kawasaki KX65 uses Single cylinder, two-stroke, while the 2010 Honda CRF50F is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2013 Kawasaki KX65 is a two-stroke engine while the 2010 Honda CRF50F runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Kawasaki KX65 or the 2010 Honda CRF50F?
The 2010 Honda CRF50F has the lower seat at 549 mm, making it more accessible. The 2013 Kawasaki KX65 sits higher at 759 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Kawasaki KX65 or the 2010 Honda CRF50F?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Kawasaki KX65 has the edge in greater ground clearance, while the 2010 Honda CRF50F stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.