2013 KTM 250 SX-F vs 2016 Husqvarna TC250

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 KTM 250 SX-F 2013 KTM 250 SX-F

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
226.6 pounds
2016 Husqvarna TC250 2016 Husqvarna TC250

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
97.7 kg / 215.4 lbs
Full Specifications
General
ColoursOrange/black-
Warranty-2 Years
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)14.8 inches15.2 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)375 mm385 mm
Seat Height992 mm / 39.1 in.992 mm / 39.1 in.
Wheelbase1,495 mm / 58.9 in.1,495 mm / 58.9 in.
Height1,140 mm / 44.9 in.-
Length2,090 mm / 82.3 in.-
Width830 mm / 32.7 in.-
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.06 quarts
Oil Capacity (l)-0.90 litres
Dry Weight102.8 kg / 226.6 lbs97.7 kg / 215.4 lbs
Fuel Capacity7.50 litres / 1.98 gallons7.50 litres / 1.98 gallons
Performance
Max Torque9.20 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000 Revolutions-
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.0815 HP/kg-
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.1 x 2.1 inches2.6 x 2.8 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)78.0 x 52.3 mm66.4 x 72.0 mm
Displacement (cc)249.91 cc249.50 cc
Displacement (ci)15.25 cubic inches15.22 cubic inches
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Fuel ControlSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)
Engine Detail-Reed valves
Fuel SystemCarburettor-
Compression Ratio10.6:1-
Engine LubricationForced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps-
IgnitionContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustmentKokusan
StarterElectricKick
Valve System2-
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operatedWet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Primary Drive13:48. Primary drive: 22:68.-
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing25CrMo4 steel central-tube frame
Suspension - FrontWP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA CCWP USD ? 48 mm 4CS closed cartridge
Suspension - RearWP ?Suspension 5018 BAVP DCCWP shock absorber with linkage
Rake26.5°26.5°
Wheel Travel - Front205 mm / 8.1 in.300 mm / 11.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear185 mm / 7.3 in.317 mm / 12.5 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.3 inches7.9 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)210 mm200 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)8.7 inches10.2 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)220 mm260 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Four-piston calipers.Single disc
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.Single disc
Tyres - Front100/80-1780/100-21
Tyres - Rear110/80-17120/90-19

Verdict

Winner on specs

2016 Husqvarna TC250

The 2016 Husqvarna TC250 edges out the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F thanks to its higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 KTM 250 SX-F - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2013 KTM 250 SX-F matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2016 Husqvarna TC250 - Advantages

  • More rear wheel travel: 317 mm vs 185 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 205 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 KTM 250 SX-F vs 2016 Husqvarna TC250 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F and 2016 Husqvarna TC250?
The 2013 KTM 250 SX-F uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F is a four-stroke engine while the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which should I buy, the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F or the 2016 Husqvarna TC250?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 KTM 250 SX-F has its own strengths, while the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 stands out for higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.