2017 KTM 250 SX-F vs 2016 Husqvarna TC250

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2017 KTM 250 SX-F 2017 KTM 250 SX-F

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
98.2 kg / 216.5 lbs
2016 Husqvarna TC250 2016 Husqvarna TC250

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
97.7 kg / 215.4 lbs
Full Specifications
General
ColoursOrange/white/black-
Warranty-2 Years
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)14.6 inches15.2 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)370 mm385 mm
Seat Height960 mm / 37.8 in.992 mm / 39.1 in.
Wheelbase1,485 mm / 58.5 in.1,495 mm / 58.9 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-0.90 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.06 quarts
Dry Weight98.2 kg / 216.5 lbs97.7 kg / 215.4 lbs
Fuel Capacity7.00 litres / 1.85 gallons7.50 litres / 1.98 gallons
Performance
Maximum RPM14000-
Engine
Bore x Stroke (mm)78.0 x 52.3 mm66.4 x 72.0 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.1 x 2.1 inches2.6 x 2.8 inches
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Fuel ControlDouble Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)
Displacement (ci)15.25 cubic inches15.22 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)249.91 cc249.50 cc
Engine Detail-Reed valves
IgnitionKeihin EMSKokusan
StarterElectricKick
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operatedWet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Primary Drive13:48. Primary drive: 22:68.-
Chassis
Frame Type25CrMo4 steel central-tube frame25CrMo4 steel central-tube frame
Suspension - FrontWP-USD, AER 48, ? 48 mmWP USD ? 48 mm 4CS closed cartridge
Suspension - RearWP shock absorber with linkageWP shock absorber with linkage
Rake26.5°26.5°
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in.300 mm / 11.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear300 mm / 11.8 in.317 mm / 12.5 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.2 inches10.2 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)260 mm260 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches7.9 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm200 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearingsSingle disc
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearingsSingle disc
RimsCNC machined hubs. Excel rims. Wire spoked.-
Tyres - Front-80/100-21
Tyres - Rear-120/90-19

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2017 KTM 250 SX-F and the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2017 KTM 250 SX-F - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 960 mm vs 992 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2016 Husqvarna TC250 - Advantages

  • More rear wheel travel: 317 mm vs 300 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2017 KTM 250 SX-F vs 2016 Husqvarna TC250 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2017 KTM 250 SX-F and 2016 Husqvarna TC250?
The 2017 KTM 250 SX-F uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2017 KTM 250 SX-F is a four-stroke engine while the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2017 KTM 250 SX-F or the 2016 Husqvarna TC250?
The 2017 KTM 250 SX-F has the lower seat at 960 mm, making it more accessible. The 2016 Husqvarna TC250 sits higher at 992 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2017 KTM 250 SX-F or the 2016 Husqvarna TC250?
Both are strong choices. The 2017 KTM 250 SX-F has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 stands out for higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.