MotoSpecs

2016 KTM 250 SX vs 2014 Honda CRF250R

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2016 KTM 250 SX 2016 KTM 250 SX

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
95.9 kg / 211.4 lbs
2014 Honda CRF250R 2014 Honda CRF250R

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
231.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Comments-Model ID: CRF250R
ColoursOrange/white/blackRed
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)385 mm323 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)15.2 inches12.7 inches
Seat Height992 mm / 39.1 in.950 mm / 37.4 in.
Wheelbase1,495 mm / 58.9 in.1,488 mm / 58.6 in.
Height-1,271 mm / 50.0 in.
Length-2,191 mm / 86.3 in.
Width-827 mm / 32.6 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.12 quarts
Oil Capacity (l)-1.80 litres
Dry Weight95.9 kg / 211.4 lbs-
Fuel Capacity7.00 litres / 1.85 gallons6.28 litres / 1.66 gallons
Wet Weight-104.8 kg / 231.0 lbs
Performance
Max Torque-47.70 Nm (4.9 kgf-m or 35.2 ft.lbs) @ 6500
Engine
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Displacement (ci)15.19 cubic inches15.19 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)249.00 cc249.00 cc
Bore x Stroke (mm)66.4 x 72.0 mm76.8 x 53.8 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)2.6 x 2.8 inches3.0 x 2.1 inches
Fuel Control-SOHC
Engine DetailReed intake.-
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Keihin PWK 38S AGInjection. Dual-Timing Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI), 46mm throttle body
Compression Ratio-13.5:1
Emissions-Meets current California Air Resources Board (CARB) and EPA off-road emissions standards.
IgnitionContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment, type KokusanFull transistor with electronic advance
StarterKickKick
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulicsMulti plate wet clutch
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Primary Drive13:48. Primary drive: 26:72. 520 X-ring chain.#520 Chain; 13T/49T
Chassis
Frame TypeChrome-molybdenum steel central-tube-
Suspension - FrontWP USD closed cartridge ? 48 mm48mm inverted Showa cartridge fork with 16-position rebound and 16-position compression damping adjustability
Suspension - RearWP shock absorber with linkagePro-Link® Showa single shock with spring preload, 17-position rebound damping adjustability, and compression-damping adjustment separated into low-speed (13 positions) and high-speed (3.5 turns); 12.3 inches travel
Rake26.5°27.0°
Trail-118 mm / 4.6 in.
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in.241 mm / 9.5 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear300 mm / 11.8 in.61 mm / 2.4 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm240 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)260 mm240 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.2 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Four-piston calipers.Double disc. Two-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.Single disc
Tyres - Front-80/100-21
Tyres - Rear-100/90-19

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2016 KTM 250 SX and the 2014 Honda CRF250R are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2016 KTM 250 SX - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 385 mm vs 323 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 300 mm vs 61 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 241 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2014 Honda CRF250R - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 950 mm vs 992 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2016 KTM 250 SX vs 2014 Honda CRF250R - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2016 KTM 250 SX and 2014 Honda CRF250R?
The 2016 KTM 250 SX uses Single cylinder, two-stroke, while the 2014 Honda CRF250R is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2016 KTM 250 SX is a two-stroke engine while the 2014 Honda CRF250R runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2016 KTM 250 SX or the 2014 Honda CRF250R?
The 2014 Honda CRF250R has the lower seat at 950 mm, making it more accessible. The 2016 KTM 250 SX sits higher at 992 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2016 KTM 250 SX or the 2014 Honda CRF250R?
Both are strong choices. The 2016 KTM 250 SX has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2014 Honda CRF250R stands out for lower seat height and fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All KTM 250 SX years All Honda CRF250R years
Build your own comparison →