2012 KTM 350 XCF-W vs 2012 Yamaha WR 250F
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | Orange/black/white | Blue/White |
| Warranty | 12 Months | 30 Day (Limited Factory Warranty) |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 13.6 inches | 14.4 inches |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 345 mm | 366 mm |
| Seat Height | 970 mm / 38.2 in. | 980 mm / 38.6 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,482 mm / 58.3 in. | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. |
| Height | 1,146 mm / 45.1 in. | 1,298 mm / 51.1 in. |
| Length | 2,065 mm / 81.3 in. | 2,164 mm / 85.2 in. |
| Width | 1,204 mm / 47.4 in. | 826 mm / 32.5 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 107 kg / 235.9 lbs | - |
| Fuel Capacity | 8.50 litres / 2.25 gallons | 7.95 litres / 2.10 gallons |
| Wet Weight | 292.1 kg / 643.9 lbs | 116.1 kg / 256.0 lbs |
| Performance |
| Maximum RPM | 12000 | - |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.5 x 2.3 inches | 3.0 x 2.1 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 88.0 x 57.5 mm | 77.0 x 53.6 mm |
| Displacement (cc) | 349.70 cc | 250.00 cc |
| Displacement (ci) | 21.34 cubic inches | 15.26 cubic inches |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, four-stroke | Single cylinder, four-stroke |
| Fuel Control | Single Overhead Cams (SOHC) | DOHC |
| Engine Detail | Titanium valves | Titanium valves |
| Fuel System | Injection | Carburettor. Keihin FCR 37 |
| Compression Ratio | 13.2:1 | 12.5:1 |
| Engine Lubrication | Pressure circulation lubrication with two Eaton pumps | Wet, multidisc |
| Ignition | Contactless controlled fully electronic ignition with digital ignition adjustment | CDI |
| Starter | Electric & kick | Electric |
| Valve System | - | 5 |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Multidisc clutch in oil bath/hydraulically activated | Wet multiplate |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Primary Drive | Primary transmission 24:73 Final drive 13:52. | Constant-mesh 5-speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing | - |
| Suspension - Front | WP Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PA | Inverted fork |
| Suspension - Rear | WPSuspension PDS 5018 DCC | Single shock |
| Rake | 26.5° | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 300 mm / 11.8 in. | 300 mm / 6.3 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 335 mm / 13.2 in. | 180 mm / 7.1 in. |
| Electrical Systems |
| Lighting system | 30W x 2 halogen | Dual 30W Krypton multireflector headlights and 21/5W brakelight |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | 220 mm | 245 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | 8.7 inches | 9.6 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 260 mm | 250 mm |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 10.2 inches | 9.8 inches |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rims | Excel AL7 rims with silver anodized stripes, | - |
| Tyres - Front | 80/100-21 | 80/100-21 |
| Tyres - Rear | 100/90-19 | 100/100-18 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2012 KTM 350 XCF-W
The 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W edges out the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F thanks to its fuel injection and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2012 KTM 350 XCF-W - Advantages
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
- 🔄More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 180 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
2012 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages
- 🏔️More ground clearance: 366 mm vs 345 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
2012 KTM 350 XCF-W vs 2012 Yamaha WR 250F - FAQs
Which should I buy, the 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W or the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W has the edge in fuel injection and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F stands out for greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.