2013 KTM 500 XC-W vs 2014 Yamaha WR 450F

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 KTM 500 XC-W 2013 KTM 500 XC-W

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Four stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
114 kg / 251 lbs
2014 Yamaha WR 450F 2014 Yamaha WR 450F

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Four stroke, Single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valves
Power
58 hp / 42.3 kW @ 9000 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
122 kg / 268 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year2012 - 132013 - 14
Make ModelKTM 500 XC-WYamaha WR450F
Dimensions
Seat Height970 mm / 38.19 in960 mm / 37.8 in
Wheelbase1482 mm / 58.3 in1475 mm / 58.1 in
Ground Clearance345 mm / 13.58 in335 mm / 13.2 in
Height-1275 mm / 50.2 in
Length-2315 mm / 91.1 in
Width-825 mm / 32.5 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight-112.5 kg / 268 lbs
Fuel Capacity8.5 L / 2.2 US gal / 1,9 Imp gal7.2 Litres / 1.9 US gal
Oil Capacity-1.2 L / 2.5 US pt
Wet Weight114 kg / 251 lbs122 kg / 268 lbs
Performance
Max Power-58 hp / 42.3 kW @ 9000 rpm
Max Torque-5.0 kgf-m 36.2 ft-lb @ 7500 rpm
Engine
Displacement510.4 cc / 31.1 cu-in449 cc / 27.4 cu in
Engine DetailFour stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, Single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valves
Bore x Stroke95 x 72 mm95 x 63.4 mm
Compression Ratio11.9:112.3:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
Exhaust-Single, upswept, under seat
Fuel InductionKeihin MX FCR 3939mm Keihin FCR flat-slide throttle position sensor
IgnitionContactless controlled fully electronic ignition with digital ignition adjustment, type KokusanCDI
Lubrication-Dry sump
StarterKick and electricElectric & kick
Drivetrain
ClutchMultidisc clutch in oil bath, hydraulically activatedWet, multi-disc
Final DriveChain 5/8 x 1/4"Chain
Final Drive Ratio13:50-
Primary Drive Ratios32:76-
Transmission / Drive6 Speed 5-Speed, constant mesh
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral double-cradle type 25CrMo4Aluminium bilateral beam
Suspension - FrontWP-USD ø 48 mm48mm Upside down telescopic fork
Suspension - RearWP PDS-FederbeinSwingarm, link suspension, mono shock
Rake-27°
Steering Head Angle63.5°-
Trail-115 mm / 4.5 in
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in300 mm / 11.8 in
Wheel Travel - Rear335 mm / 13.1 in305 mm / 12.0 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - FrontSingle 260 mm discHydraulic single 250 mm disc 4 piston caliper
Brakes - RearSingle 220 mm discSingle 245 mm disc 2 piston caliper
Tyres - Front90/90 - 2180/100-21 51P
Tyres - Rear120/90 - 18120/90-18 65P
Wheels-Aluminium alloy, laced spokes

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 KTM 500 XC-W

The 2013 KTM 500 XC-W edges out the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F thanks to its lighter kerb weight and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 KTM 500 XC-W - Advantages

  • Lighter: 114 kg vs 122 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 305 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2014 Yamaha WR 450F - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2014 Yamaha WR 450F matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 KTM 500 XC-W vs 2014 Yamaha WR 450F - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 KTM 500 XC-W and 2014 Yamaha WR 450F?
The 2013 KTM 500 XC-W uses Four stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder, while the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F is powered by Four stroke, Single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valves.
Which is lighter, the 2013 KTM 500 XC-W or the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F?
The 2013 KTM 500 XC-W is lighter at 114 kg compared to 122 kg for the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F - a difference of 8 kg. This is a small difference unlikely to be a deciding factor in everyday riding.
Which should I buy, the 2013 KTM 500 XC-W or the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 KTM 500 XC-W has the edge in lighter kerb weight and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.