2004 Suzuki SV 1000 vs 2004 BMW R 1150R
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | 2003 - 04 | 2003 -04 |
| Colours | - | Red, Bronze, Gray |
| Make Model | Suzuki SV 1000 | BMW R 1150R |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Heigth -Alternate (mm) | - | 800 mm |
| Seat Heigth -Alternate (in.) | - | 31.5 inches |
| Seat Height | - | 800 mm / 31.5 in (Low seat 770 mm / 30.3 in) |
| Wheelbase | - | 1487 mm / 59.4 in |
| Height | - | 1220 mm / 48.0 in |
| Length | - | 2170 mm / 85.4 in |
| Width | - | 940 mm / 37.0 in |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | - | 218 kg / 480 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | - | 20.4 Liters / 5.3 gal |
| Wet Weight | - | 238 kg / 524.7 lbs |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | - | 203.3 km/h / 126.3 mph |
| Max Power | - | 70 kW / 95 hp @ 7250 rpm |
| Max Torque | - | 98 Nm / 10.0 kgf-m / 72.3 ft-lb / @ 5500 rpm |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | - | 0.3571 HP/kg |
| Standing Start ¼ Mile | - | 12.1 sec |
| Engine |
| Stroke | - | 4 |
| Engine Type | - | Two cylinder boxer |
| Displacement | - | 1130 cc / 69 cu in |
| Engine Detail | - | Four stroke, two cylinder horizontally opposed Boxer, 4 valves per cylinder |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 101 x 70.5 mm |
| Compression Ratio | - | 10.3:1 |
| Cooling System | - | Air/Oil cooled |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 5.56 L/100 km / 18.0 km/l / 42.3 US mpg |
| Fuel Induction | - | Bosch Motronic MA 2.4 Fuel injection |
| Fuel Reserve | - | 4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons |
| Ignition | - | Electronic ignition MA 2.2 Bosch Motronic |
| Lubrication | - | Wet sump |
| Starter | - | Electric |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Dry, single plate, hydraulic operated |
| Final Drive | - | Shaft |
| Transmission / Drive | - | 6 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Three section composite frame consisting of front & rear section, load bearing engine |
| Suspension - Front | - | Telelever with central spring strut & linear-rate coil spring. Twin-tube gas-filled shock |
| Suspension - Rear | - | Patented BMW Paralever swingarm & shaft drive, single tube gas filled shock, variable rebound setting |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 120 mm / 4.7 in |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 135 mm / 5.3 in |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | - | 2 x 320 mm discs, 4 piston calipers |
| Brakes - Rear | - | Single 276 mm disc, 2 piston caliper |
| Tyres - Front | - | 120/70 ZR17 |
| Tyres - Rear | - | 170/60 ZR17 |
| Wheels - Front | 3.50 x 17 | - |
| Wheels - Rear | 5.50 x 17 | - |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2004 BMW R 1150R
The 2004 BMW R 1150R edges out the 2004 Suzuki SV 1000 thanks to its fuel injection and dual front discs. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2004 Suzuki SV 1000 - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 2004 Suzuki SV 1000 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2004 BMW R 1150R - Advantages
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
- 💿Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
2004 Suzuki SV 1000 vs 2004 BMW R 1150R - FAQs
Which should I buy, the 2004 Suzuki SV 1000 or the 2004 BMW R 1150R?
Both are strong choices. The 2004 Suzuki SV 1000 has its own strengths, while the 2004 BMW R 1150R stands out for fuel injection and dual front discs. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.