2000 Suzuki SV 650 vs 2009 Ducati Monster 696
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | Yellow, blue | Red (red/black), Matte Black (black/black), White (black/black) |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | 805 mm / 31.7 in. | 770 mm / 30.3 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,420 mm / 55.9 in. | 1,450 mm / 57.1 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 169 kg / 372.6 lbs | 161 kg / 354.9 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.00 litres / 4.23 gallons | 15.00 litres / 3.96 gallons |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | 200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph | - |
| Max Torque | 62.00 | 50.60 Nm (5.2 kgf-m or 37.3 ft.lbs) |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | 0.4142 HP/kg | 0.4898 HP/kg |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | - | 88.0 x 57.2 mm |
| Fuel Control | - | Desmodromic valve control |
| Stroke | 4 | - |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | - | 3.5 x 2.3 inches |
| Engine Type | V2 | V2, four-stroke |
| Displacement (ci) | 39.91 cubic inches | 42.47 cubic inches |
| Displacement (cc) | 654.00 cc | 696.00 cc |
| Fuel System | - | Injection. Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle body |
| Compression Ratio | - | 10.7:1 |
| Exhaust | - | 2 aluminium mufflers |
| Starter | Electric | Electric |
| Valve System | - | 2 |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | APTC wet multiplate with hydraulic control |
| Final Drive | - | Chain |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Tubular steel trellis frame |
| Suspension - Front | - | Showa 43mm upside-down forks |
| Suspension - Rear | - | Progressive linkage with preload and rebound Sachs adjustable monoshock |
| Rake | - | 24.0° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 120 mm / 4.7 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 148 mm / 5.8 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 12.6 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 320 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 9.6 inches |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 245 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc | Double disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | - | 120/60-ZR17 |
| Tyres - Rear | - | 160/60-ZR17 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2009 Ducati Monster 696
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 edges out the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 thanks to its lower seat height, fuel injection and dual front discs. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2000 Suzuki SV 650 - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2009 Ducati Monster 696 - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 770 mm vs 805 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
- 💿Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
2000 Suzuki SV 650 vs 2009 Ducati Monster 696 - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 and 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 uses V2, while the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is powered by V2, four-stroke.
Which is lighter, the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 169 kg for the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 - a difference of 8 kg. This is a small difference unlikely to be a deciding factor in everyday riding.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 has the lower seat at 770 mm, making it more accessible. The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 sits higher at 805 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
Both are strong choices. The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 has its own strengths, while the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 stands out for lower seat height and fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.