2009 Triumph Rocket III vs 2008 Victory Hammer
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | 2008 - 09 | 2007 - 08 |
| Make Model | Triumph Rocket III | Victory Hammer |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | 740 mm / 29.1 in | 660 mm / 26 in |
| Wheelbase | 1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1669 mm / 65.7 in |
| Ground Clearance | - | 135 mm / 5.3 in |
| Height | 1165 mm / 45.9 in | - |
| Length | 2500 mm / 98.4 in | 2366 mm / 93.1 in |
| Width | 970 mm / 38.2 in | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 320 kg / 704 lbs | 305 kg / 672 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 24 Litres / 6.3 US gal / 5.3 Imp gal | 17 Litres / 4.5 US gal |
| Wet Weight | 350 kg / 771.6 lbs | - |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | 219.4 km/h / 136.3 mph | - |
| Max Power | 103.6 kW / 140 hp @ 5750 rpm | - |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm / 20.4 kgf-m / 147ft.lbf @ 2500 rpm | - |
| Standing Start ¼ Mile | 12.2 sec | - |
| Engine |
| Displacement | 2294 cc / 140 cu in | 1634 cc / 100 cu-in |
| Engine Detail | Four stroke, longitudinal three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder | Four stroke, 50° V twin SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder |
| Bore x Stroke | 101.6 x 94.3 mm | 101 x 102 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid cooled | Air / oil |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km / 15.6 km/l / 36.7 US mpg / 44.1 Imp mpg | - |
| Fuel Induction | - | Electronic Fuel Injection with 44mm throttle bodies |
| Ignition | Digital inductive type via electronic engine management | - |
| Starter | Electric | Electric |
| EV Specifics |
| Battery Capacity | - | 12 volts / 18 amp hours |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet, multi-plate | Wet, multi-plate |
| Final Drive | Shaft | Carbon Fiber Reinforced Belt |
| Transmission / Drive | 5 Speed | 6 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Tubular steel, twin spine | - |
| Suspension - Front | 43 mm Upside down forks | 43mm Inverted cartridge telescopic fork |
| Suspension - Rear | Chromed spring twin shocks with adjustable preload | Single, mono-tube gas forged and cast aluminum w/ rising-rate linkage |
| Rake | 32° | 32.7° |
| Trail | 152mm / 6.0 in | 140 mm / 5.5 in |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 130 mm / 5.1 in |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 100 mm / 3.9 in |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | 2 x 320mm Discs, 4 piston calipers | 2x 300mm floating rotor 4 piston caliper |
| Brakes - Rear | Single 316 mm disc, 2 piston caliper | Single 300mm floating rotor 2 piston caliper |
| Tyres - Front | 150/80 V17 | 130/70 R18 |
| Tyres - Rear | 240/50 V16 | 250/40 R18 |
| Wheels - Front | 3.5 x 17, 5 spoke | 18 x 3.5 in |
| Wheels - Rear | 7.5 x 16, 5 spoke | 18 x 8.5 in |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2009 Triumph Rocket III
The 2009 Triumph Rocket III edges out the 2008 Victory Hammer thanks to its larger fuel tank, liquid cooling, dual front discs and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2009 Triumph Rocket III - Advantages
- ⛽Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
- 🌡️Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
- 💿Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
- 🔩Larger displacement: 2294 cc vs 1634 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
2008 Victory Hammer - Advantages
- ⚖️Lighter: 305 kg vs 350 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
- 📏Lower seat height: 660 mm vs 740 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
2009 Triumph Rocket III vs 2008 Victory Hammer - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2009 Triumph Rocket III and 2008 Victory Hammer?
The 2009 Triumph Rocket III uses Four stroke, longitudinal three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder, while the 2008 Victory Hammer is powered by Four stroke, 50° V twin SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Which is lighter, the 2009 Triumph Rocket III or the 2008 Victory Hammer?
The 2008 Victory Hammer is lighter at 305 kg compared to 350 kg for the 2009 Triumph Rocket III - a difference of 45 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2009 Triumph Rocket III or the 2008 Victory Hammer?
The 2008 Victory Hammer has the lower seat at 660 mm, making it more accessible. The 2009 Triumph Rocket III sits higher at 740 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which has the larger fuel tank, the 2009 Triumph Rocket III or the 2008 Victory Hammer?
The 2009 Triumph Rocket III has the larger tank at approximately 24 litres vs 17 litres for the 2008 Victory Hammer. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 400-480 km vs 283-340 km between stops.
Which should I buy, the 2009 Triumph Rocket III or the 2008 Victory Hammer?
Both are strong choices. The 2009 Triumph Rocket III has the edge in larger fuel tank and liquid cooling, while the 2008 Victory Hammer stands out for lighter kerb weight and lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.