2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC vs 2014 Honda NC750X

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC

Super motard

Engine
In-line three, four-stroke
Power
69.1 kW / 93.9 hp @ 9300 rpm
Top Speed
196.3 km/h / 122 mph
Weight
474.0 pounds
2014 Honda NC750X 2014 Honda NC750X

Super motard

Engine
Twin, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
482.8 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsWindscreenModel ID: NC700XDd. Dual clucth.
Year2013-
ColoursBlack, white, blueBlack, Red, white, grey
Make ModelTriumph Tiger 800 XC-
Warranty-One year. Unlimited milage. Transferable.
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)160 mm165 mm
StorageTop box, saddle bags-
Ground Clearance (in.)6.3 inches6.5 inches
Seat Height810 mm -830 mm / 31.9"- 32.7" adjustable830 mm / 32.7 in.
Wheelbase1530 mm / 60.2"1,540 mm / 60.6 in.
Height1350 mm / 53.1"1,285 mm / 50.6 in.
Length2215 mm / 87.1"2,210 mm / 87.0 in.
Width795 mm / 31.3"840 mm / 33.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)3.70 litres3.70 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)0.24 quarts0.24 quarts
Dry Weight112 kg / 246.9 lbs-
Fuel Capacity18.9 Litres / 5.0 US gal / 4.2 Imp gal14.10 litres / 3.73 gallons
Wet Weight214.5 kg / 473 lbs219.0 kg / 482.8 lbs
Performance
Top Speed196.3 km/h / 122 mph-
Max Power69.1 kW / 93.9 hp @ 9300 rpm-
Max Torque79 Nm / 8.1 kgf-m / 58 ft.lb @ 7850 rpm68.00 Nm (6.9 kgf-m or 50.2 ft.lbs) @ 4750
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.1102 HP/kg-
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.2 sec-
Engine
Bore x Stroke (mm)-77.0 x 80.0 mm
Displacement (cc)-745.00 cc
Displacement (ci)-45.46 cubic inches
Bore x Stroke (in,)-3.0 x 3.1 inches
CO2133.2 CO85.4 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission)
Engine TypeIn-line three, four-strokeTwin, four-stroke
Fuel ControlDOHCSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)
Displacement799 cc / 48.7 cu-in-
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.-
Fuel SystemInjection. Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injectionInjection
Bore x Stroke74 x 61.9 mm-
Compression Ratio12.0:110.7:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooled-
Emissions-Meets current EPA standards. Models sold in California meet current CARB standards and may differ slightly due to emissions equipment.
ExhaustStainless Steel, 3 into 1, high-level exhaust-
Fuel Consumption5.3 L/100 km / 18.8 km/l / 44.2 US mpg / 53 Imp mpg3.68 litres/100 km (27.2 km/l or 63.92 mpg)
Fuel InductionMultipoint sequential electronic fuel injection-
IgnitionDigital CDIABS
LubricationWet sump-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-plateWet multiplate hydraulic clutch (DCT:Wet multiplate hydraulic 2-clutch)
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary DriveO ring chain-
Transmission / Drive6 Speed-
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel trellis frame, twin-sided swingarmDiamond; steel pipe
Suspension - FrontShowa 45mm upside down forks41mm telescopic fork, 153.5mm stroke
Suspension - RearShowa monoshock with remote oil reservoir, hydraulically adjustable preload, rebound damping adjustmentMonoshock damper, Pro-Link swingarm, 150mm travel
Rake23.9°27.0°
Trail92.4mm / 3.6"110 mm / 4.3 in.
Wheel Travel - Front220 mm / 8.7"-
Wheel Travel - Rear215 mm / 8.5"150 mm / 5.9 in.
Electrical Systems
InstrumentationLCD multi-functional instrument pack with digital speedometer, trip computer, analogue tachometer, gear position indicator, fuel gauge, service indicator, switchable ABS and clock-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.0 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)255 mm240 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)308 mm320 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.1 inches12.6 inches
Brakes - Front2 x 308mm floating discs, Nissin 2-piston floating caliber (Switchable ABS available), Nissin front brake master cylinder, 14mm diameterSingle disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle 255mm disc, Nissin single-piston floating caliber (Switchable ABS available)Single disc. Hydraulic. Single-piston caliper.
Rims-17M/C x MT4.50
Tyres - Front90/90 ZR21120/70-ZR17
Tyres - Rear150/70 ZR17160/60-ZR17
Wheels - Front2.50 x 21" Cast aluminium rim, 36 spoke-
Wheels - Rear4.25 x 17" Cast aluminium rim, 32 spoke-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC

The 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC edges out the 2014 Honda NC750X thanks to its lower seat height, liquid cooling, dual front discs and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 810 mm -830 mm vs 830 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More rear wheel travel: 215 mm vs 150 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2014 Honda NC750X - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2014 Honda NC750X matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC vs 2014 Honda NC750X - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC and 2014 Honda NC750X?
The 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC uses In-line three, four-stroke, while the 2014 Honda NC750X is powered by Twin, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2014 Honda NC750X?
The 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC has the lower seat at 810 mm -830 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 Honda NC750X sits higher at 830 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2014 Honda NC750X?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Triumph Tiger 800 XC has the edge in lower seat height and liquid cooling, while the 2014 Honda NC750X offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.