2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 vs 2013 Triumph Sprint GT

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900

Sport touring

Engine
Four stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 12 Valve
Power
84.6 kW / 114 hp @ 10,000 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
207 kg / 462 lbs
2013 Triumph Sprint GT 2013 Triumph Sprint GT

Sport touring

Engine
Four stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Power
96 kW / 128 hp @ 9200 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
265 kg / 584.2 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year2015 - 162013
Make ModelYamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900Triumph Sprint GT
Dimensions
Seat Height845 mm - 860 mm / 33.3 in - 33.9 in815 mm / 32.1 in
Wheelbase1440 mm / 56.7 in1537 mm / 60.5 in
Ground Clearance135 mm / 5.3 in-
Height1338 mm to 1375 mm / 52.9 in to 54.1 inwithout mirrors 1210 mm / 47.6 in
Length2160 mm / 85.0 in2260 mm / 88.9 in
Width850 mm / 37.4 in(handlebars) 760 mm / 29.9 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight-239 kg / 527 lbs
Fuel Capacity18 Litres / 4.8 US gal20 Litres / 5.3 US gal / 4.4 Imp gal
Wet Weight207 kg / 462 lbs265 kg / 584.2 lbs
Performance
Max Power84.6 kW / 114 hp @ 10,000 rpm96 kW / 128 hp @ 9200 rpm
Max Torque87.5 Nm / 8.9 kgf-m @ 8,500 rpm108 Nm / 11.0 kgf-m / 80 ft-lb @ 6300 rpm
Engine
Displacement847 cc / 51.6 cu-in1050 cc / 64.1 cu in
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 12 ValveFour stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Bore x Stroke78 x 59.1 mm79 x 71.4mm
Compression Ratio11.5 :112.0:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
Engine Oil Specification-Synthetic, 10W/40 Synthetic
Fuel InductionElectronic Fuel InjectionMultipoint sequential electronic fuel injection with SAI
IgnitionTransistorized coil ignition Digital
LubricationWet sumpWet sump
Spark Plug-NGK, CR9EK
StarterElectricElectric
Drivetrain
Clutch Wet, multiple-disc-
Final DriveChainChain
Transmission / Drive6 Speed 6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeDiamond frameAluminium beam perimeter, swingarm single-sided, aluminium alloy with eccentric chain adjuster
Suspension - Front41mm fork; adjustable preload and rebound dampingShowa 43mm cartridge forks with dual rate springs and adjustable preload
Suspension - RearRear Single shock; adjustable preload and rebound dampingShowa monoshock with adjustable preload and rebound damping
Rake24°23.5°
Trail100 mm / 3.9 in84 mm / 3.3 in
Wheel Travel - Front137 mm / 5.4 in127 mm / 5.0 in
Wheel Travel - Rear130 mm / 5.1 in152 mm / 6.0 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front2x 298mm discs2 x 320 mm Floating discs, 4 piston calipers, ABS
Brakes - RearSingle 245mm discSingle 255 mm disc, 2 piston caliper, ABS
References
NotesThe Yamaha Tracer 900, in USA known as the FJ-09 until 2017, then known as the Tracer 900, while in Japan, South America, Australia, and New Zealand it is known as the MT-09 Tracer.)-
Wheels & Brakes
Tyres - Front120/70-ZR17M/C120/70-ZR17
Tyres - Rear180/55-ZR17M/C180/55-ZR17
Wheels - Front-Cast aluminium alloy 5-spoke 17 x 3.50 in
Wheels - Rear-Cast aluminium alloy 5-spoke 17 x 5.50 in

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Triumph Sprint GT

The 2013 Triumph Sprint GT edges out the 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 thanks to its larger fuel tank, lower seat height, dual front discs, higher rear wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 - Advantages

  • Lighter: 207 kg vs 265 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • More front wheel travel: 137 mm vs 127 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 Triumph Sprint GT - Advantages

  • Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
  • Lower seat height: 815 mm vs 845 mm - 860 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • Larger displacement: 1050 cc vs 847 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More rear wheel travel: 152 mm vs 130 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 vs 2013 Triumph Sprint GT - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 and 2013 Triumph Sprint GT?
The 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 uses Four stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 12 Valve, while the 2013 Triumph Sprint GT is powered by Four stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder..
Which is lighter, the 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 or the 2013 Triumph Sprint GT?
The 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 is lighter at 207 kg compared to 265 kg for the 2013 Triumph Sprint GT - a difference of 58 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 or the 2013 Triumph Sprint GT?
The 2013 Triumph Sprint GT has the lower seat at 815 mm, making it more accessible. The 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 sits higher at 845 mm - 860 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which has the larger fuel tank, the 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 or the 2013 Triumph Sprint GT?
The 2013 Triumph Sprint GT has the larger tank at approximately 20 litres vs 18 litres for the 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 333-400 km vs 300-360 km between stops.
Which should I buy, the 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 or the 2013 Triumph Sprint GT?
Both are strong choices. The 2016 Yamaha FJ-09 / MT-09 Tracer / Tracer 900 has the edge in lighter kerb weight and higher front wheel travel, while the 2013 Triumph Sprint GT stands out for larger fuel tank and lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.