2010 Yamaha TW 200 vs 2013 Honda CRF250R

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2010 Yamaha TW 200 2010 Yamaha TW 200

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
279.0 pounds
2013 Honda CRF250R 2013 Honda CRF250R

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
227.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Comments-Model ID: CRF250R
ColoursWhite/RedRed
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)10.4 inches12.7 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)264 mm323 mm
Seat Height790 mm / 31.1 in.950 mm / 37.4 in.
Wheelbase1,326 mm / 52.2 in.1,488 mm / 58.6 in.
Height1,120 mm / 44.1 in.1,171 mm / 46.1 in.
Length2,090 mm / 82.3 in.1,900 mm / 74.8 in.
Width820 mm / 32.3 in.770 mm / 30.3 in.
Weights & Capacities
Fuel Capacity6.81 litres / 1.80 gallons5.68 litres / 1.50 gallons
Wet Weight126.6 kg / 279.0 lbs103.0 kg / 227.0 lbs
Performance
Max Torque-14.10 Nm (1.4 kgf-m or 10.4 ft.lbs) @ 11000 Revolutions
Engine
CO269.8 CO-
Displacement (cc)196.00 cc249.00 cc
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Bore x Stroke (in,)2.6 x 2.2 inches3.0 x 2.1 inches
Fuel ControlSOHCSOHC
Displacement (ci)11.96 cubic inches15.19 cubic inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)67.0 x 55.7 mm76.8 x 53.8 mm
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Mikuni® 28mmInjection. Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI), 46mm throttle body
Compression Ratio9.5:113.2:1
Emissions-Consult owners manual for optional racing parts.
Fuel Consumption3.01 litres/100 km (33.2 km/l or 78.15 mpg)-
IgnitionCDIFull transistor with electronic advance
StarterElectricKick
Valve System-4
Drivetrain
ClutchMultiple-disc wet clutch-
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Primary Drive-#520 Chain; 13T/49T
Chassis
Frame Type-Semi-double cradle; steel tube
Suspension - FrontTelescopic fork48mm inverted Showa cartridge fork with 16-position rebound and 16-position compression damping adjustability
Suspension - RearSingle shockPro-Link® Showa single shock with spring preload, 17-position rebound damping adjustability, and compression-damping adjustment separated into low-speed (13 positions) and high-speed (3.5 turns); 12.3 inches travel
Rake-27.0°
Trail-118 mm / 4.6 in.
Wheel Travel - Front160 mm / 6.3 in.275 mm / 12.2 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear150 mm / 5.9 in.282 mm / 11.1 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)110 mm240 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)4.3 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)220 mm240 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)8.7 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - FrontSingle discDouble disc. Two-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearExpanding brake (drum brake)Single disc
Rims-Aluminium rim/wire spoke
Tyres - Front130/80-1880/100-21
Tyres - Rear180/80-14100/90-19

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Honda CRF250R

The 2013 Honda CRF250R edges out the 2010 Yamaha TW 200 thanks to its fuel injection, dual front discs, greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2010 Yamaha TW 200 - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 790 mm vs 950 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2013 Honda CRF250R - Advantages

  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More ground clearance: 323 mm vs 264 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 282 mm vs 150 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 275 mm vs 160 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2010 Yamaha TW 200 vs 2013 Honda CRF250R - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2010 Yamaha TW 200 or the 2013 Honda CRF250R?
The 2010 Yamaha TW 200 has the lower seat at 790 mm, making it more accessible. The 2013 Honda CRF250R sits higher at 950 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2010 Yamaha TW 200 or the 2013 Honda CRF250R?
Both are strong choices. The 2010 Yamaha TW 200 has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2013 Honda CRF250R stands out for fuel injection and dual front discs. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.