2012 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2014 KTM 200 XC-W
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Comments | - | German brand. |
| Colours | Blue/White | Orange/black |
| Warranty | 30 Day (Limited Factory Warranty) | - |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 366 mm | 355 mm |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 14.4 inches | 14.0 inches |
| Seat Height | 980 mm / 38.6 in. | 960 mm / 37.8 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. | 1,471 mm / 57.9 in. |
| Height | 1,298 mm / 51.1 in. | 1,120 mm / 44.1 in. |
| Length | 2,164 mm / 85.2 in. | 2,120 mm / 83.5 in. |
| Width | 826 mm / 32.5 in. | 840 mm / 33.1 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | - | 99.5 kg / 219.4 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 7.95 litres / 2.10 gallons | 10.00 litres / 2.64 gallons |
| Wet Weight | 116.1 kg / 256.0 lbs | 112.0 kg / 246.9 lbs |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | - | 45.1 km/h / 28.0 mph |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.0 x 2.1 inches | 2.5 x 2.4 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 77.0 x 53.6 mm | 64.0 x 60.0 mm |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, four-stroke | Single cylinder, two-stroke |
| Fuel Control | DOHC | - |
| Displacement (ci) | 15.26 cubic inches | 11.78 cubic inches |
| Displacement (cc) | 250.00 cc | 193.00 cc |
| Engine Detail | Titanium valves | Reed intake. |
| Fuel System | Carburettor. Keihin FCR 37 | Carburettor |
| Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | - |
| Emissions | - | Euro 2 |
| Engine Lubrication | Wet, multidisc | - |
| Exhaust | - | Stainless steel exhaust |
| Ignition | CDI | Contactless controlled fully electronic ignition with digital ignition adjustment, type Kokusan |
| Starter | Electric | Electric & kick |
| Valve System | 5 | - |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet multiplate | Multidisc clutch in oil bath/hydraulically activated |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Primary Drive | Constant-mesh 5-speed | 5/8 x 1/4 |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing |
| Suspension - Front | Inverted fork | WP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PA |
| Suspension - Rear | Single shock | WP ?Suspension PDS 5018 DCC |
| Rake | - | 26.5° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 300 mm / 6.3 in. | 300 mm / 11.8 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 180 mm / 7.1 in. | 335 mm / 13.2 in. |
| Electrical Systems |
| Instrumentation | - | Digital cockpit |
| Lighting system | Dual 30W Krypton multireflector headlights and 21/5W brakelight | - |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | 245 mm | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | 9.6 inches | 8.7 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 250 mm | 260 mm |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 9.8 inches | 10.2 inches |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings |
| Tyres - Front | 80/100-21 | 110/70-17 |
| Tyres - Rear | 100/100-18 | 130/70-17 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2014 KTM 200 XC-W
The 2014 KTM 200 XC-W edges out the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F thanks to its lower seat height and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2012 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2014 KTM 200 XC-W - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 960 mm vs 980 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
- 🔄More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 180 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
2012 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2014 KTM 200 XC-W - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F and 2014 KTM 200 XC-W?
The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F is a four-stroke engine while the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F or the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W?
The 2014 KTM 200 XC-W has the lower seat at 960 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F sits higher at 980 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F or the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F has its own strengths, while the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W stands out for lower seat height and higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.