2012 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2013 KTM 300 EXC
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | Blue/White | Orange/black |
| Warranty | 30 Day (Limited Factory Warranty) | - |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 366 mm | 355 mm |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 14.4 inches | 14.0 inches |
| Seat Height | 980 mm / 38.6 in. | 960 mm / 37.8 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. | 1,482 mm / 58.3 in. |
| Height | 1,298 mm / 51.1 in. | 1,140 mm / 44.9 in. |
| Length | 2,164 mm / 85.2 in. | 2,090 mm / 82.3 in. |
| Width | 826 mm / 32.5 in. | 830 mm / 32.7 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | - | 104 kg / 229.3 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 7.95 litres / 2.10 gallons | 9.50 litres / 2.51 gallons |
| Wet Weight | 116.1 kg / 256.0 lbs | - |
| Performance |
| Max Torque | - | 9.20 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000 Revolutions |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | - | 0.0815 HP/kg |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.0 x 2.1 inches | 2.8 x 2.8 inches |
| Fuel Control | DOHC | Single Overhead Cams (SOHC) |
| Displacement (cc) | 250.00 cc | 293.00 cc |
| Displacement (ci) | 15.26 cubic inches | 17.88 cubic inches |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, four-stroke | Single cylinder, two-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 77.0 x 53.6 mm | 72.0 x 72.0 mm |
| Engine Detail | Titanium valves | Reed intake. |
| Fuel System | Carburettor. Keihin FCR 37 | Carburettor |
| Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Engine Lubrication | Wet, multidisc | - |
| Ignition | CDI | Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment, type Kokusan |
| Starter | Electric | Electric & kick |
| Valve System | 5 | 2 |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet multiplate | Wet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Primary Drive | Constant-mesh 5-speed | 14:50 (13:50). Primary drive: 26:72. |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing |
| Suspension - Front | Inverted fork | WP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PA |
| Suspension - Rear | Single shock | WP ?Suspension PDS 5018 DCC |
| Rake | - | 26.5° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 300 mm / 6.3 in. | 300 mm / 11.8 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 180 mm / 7.1 in. | 335 mm / 13.2 in. |
| Electrical Systems |
| Lighting system | Dual 30W Krypton multireflector headlights and 21/5W brakelight | - |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | 245 mm | 240 mm |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 9.8 inches | 11.0 inches |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | 9.6 inches | 9.4 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 250 mm | 280 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | 80/100-21 | 100/80-17 |
| Tyres - Rear | 100/100-18 | 110/80-17 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2013 KTM 300 EXC
The 2013 KTM 300 EXC edges out the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F thanks to its lower seat height and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2012 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2013 KTM 300 EXC - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 960 mm vs 980 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
- 🔄More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 180 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
2012 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2013 KTM 300 EXC - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F and 2013 KTM 300 EXC?
The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2013 KTM 300 EXC is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F is a four-stroke engine while the 2013 KTM 300 EXC runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F or the 2013 KTM 300 EXC?
The 2013 KTM 300 EXC has the lower seat at 960 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F sits higher at 980 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F or the 2013 KTM 300 EXC?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F has its own strengths, while the 2013 KTM 300 EXC stands out for lower seat height and higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.