MotoSpecs

2016 BMW F 800R vs 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2016 BMW F 800R 2016 BMW F 800R

Naked bike

Engine
Twin, four-stroke
Power
64 kW / 87 hp @ 8000 rpm
Top Speed
218 km/h / 135.5 mph
Weight
445.3 pounds
2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, transverse three cylinder. DOHC, 4 Valve per cylinder,
Power
92 kW / 125 hp @ 11600 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
167 Kg / 368.2 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year20162014 - 15
ColoursRacing Blue Metallic Matte/Light White, Light White, Black Satin Gloss/Light White, Racing Blue Metallic Matte/Black Satin Gloss-
Make ModelBMW F 800R MV Agusta Dragster 800
Dimensions
Seat Height800 mm / 31.5 in. (low seat: 775 mm / 30.5 in., high seat: 825 mm / 32.5 in)811 mm / 31.9 in
Wheelbase1,520 mm / 59.8 in.1380 mm / 54.3 in
Ground Clearance-160 mm / 6.3 in
Height1160 mm / 45.7 in (excl. mirrors)-
Length2145 mm / 84.4 in.2060 mm / 81.0 in
Width905 mm / 35.6 in. (incl. mirrors)825 mm / 32.4 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight177 kg / 390 lbs167 Kg / 368.2 lbs
Fuel Capacity16 Litres / 4.2 US gal16.6 Litres / 4.3 US gal
Wet Weight199 kg / 439 lbs.-
Performance
Top Speed218 km/h / 135.5 mph-
Max Power64 kW / 87 hp @ 8000 rpm92 kW / 125 hp @ 11600 rpm
Max Torque86 Nm / 8.8 kgf-m / 63 lbs/ft @ 6000 rpm81 Nm / 8.25 kgf-m @ 9600 rpm.
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.5085 HP/kg-
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.0 sec-
Engine
Engine TypeTwin, four-stroke-
Fuel ControlDouble Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)-
CO283.5 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission)-
Displacement798 cc / 47.7 cub. in.798 cc / 48.7 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, transverse three cylinder. DOHC, 4 Valve per cylinder,
Fuel SystemInjection. Electronic intake pipe injection / digital engine management (BMS-KP)-
Bore x Stroke82 x 75.8 mm79 x 54.3 mm
Compression Ratio12.0:113.3;1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid Cooled
EmissionsClosed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard EU-3-
Engine LubricationDry sump-
ExhaustClosed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard-
Fuel Consumption6.1 L/100 km / 16.4 km/l / 38.6 US mpg-
Fuel InductionElectronic injection, digital engine electronics (BMS-KP)Integrated ignition - injection system MVICS (Motor & Vehicle Integrated Control System) with three injectors Engine control unit Eldor EM2.0, throttle body full drive by wire Mikuni, pencil-coil with ion-sensing technology, control of detonation and misfire Torque control with four maps, Traction Control with eight levels of intervention
Fuel Reserve3.00 litres / 0.79 gallons5 Litres 1.3 US gal
IgnitionKnock control and oxygen sensors.Multipoint electronic injection
LubricationWet sump-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System4-
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity12 V / 14 Ah, maintenance-free-
Drivetrain
ClutchMulti-plate clutch in oil bath, mechanically operatedWet, multi-disc with mechanical drive Cassette style
Final DriveChainChain
Final Drive Ratio-16/41
Gear Ratios1st 2.462 / 2nd 1.750 / 3rd 1.381 / 4th 1.227 / 5th 1.130 / 6th 1.042: 11st: 13/37 2nd 16/34 3rd 18/32 4th 19/30 5th 21/30 6th 22/29
Gearbox6-speed-
Primary DriveO-ring chain with shock damping in rear wheel hub-
Transmission / Drive6 Speed 6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeBridge frame made aluminium, load-supporting engineALS Steel tubular trellis Aluminium alloy
Suspension - Front43mm Telescopic fork Marzocchi "UPSIDE DOWN" telescopic hydraulic fork with rebound-compression damping and spring preload external and separate adjustment 43 mm
Suspension - RearCast aluminium double-sided swing arm, central, suspension strut, spring pre-tension by means of handProgressive Sachs, single shock absorber with rebound and compression damping and spring preload adjustment Aluminium alloy
Rake25°-
Trail91 mm / 3.6 in.95 mm / 3.74 in.
Wheel Travel - Front125 mm / 4.9 in.125 mm / 4.9 in
Wheel Travel - Rear125 mm / 4.9 in. 125 mm / 4.9 in
Electrical Systems
AlternatorThree-phase alternator 400 W350 Wat 5000 r.p.m. 12V-8.6Ah
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.4 inches-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)265 mm-
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm-
Brakes - Front2 x 320mm discs, 4 piston calipers2x 320mm floating discs 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 265mm disc, 1 piston caliperSingle 220mm disc 2 piston caliper
RimsCast aluminium-
Tyres - Front120/70 ZR17120/70 - ZR 17
Tyres - Rear180/55 ZR17200/50 - ZR 17
WheelsCast aluminium-
Wheels - Front3.50 x 17"Aluminium alloy 3.50 " x 17 '
Wheels - Rear5.50 x 17"Aluminium alloy 5.50 " x 17 '

Verdict

Winner on specs

2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800

The 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800 edges out the 2016 BMW F 800R thanks to its more peak power and lighter kerb weight. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2016 BMW F 800R - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 86 Nm vs 81 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800 - Advantages

  • More power: Produces 92 kW vs 64 kW - a meaningful performance advantage.
  • Lighter: 167 Kg vs 199 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.

2016 BMW F 800R vs 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2016 BMW F 800R and 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800?
The 2016 BMW F 800R uses Twin, four-stroke, while the 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800 is powered by Four stroke, transverse three cylinder. DOHC, 4 Valve per cylinder,.
Which is lighter, the 2016 BMW F 800R or the 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800?
The 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800 is lighter at 167 Kg compared to 199 kg for the 2016 BMW F 800R - a difference of 32 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which has more power, the 2016 BMW F 800R or the 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800?
The 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800 produces more peak power at 92 kW, compared to 64 kW for the 2016 BMW F 800R.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2016 BMW F 800R or the 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800?
The 2016 BMW F 800R has the lower seat at 800 mm, making it more accessible. The 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800 sits higher at 811 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2016 BMW F 800R or the 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800?
Both are strong choices. The 2016 BMW F 800R has the edge in higher torque and dual front discs, while the 2015 MV Agusta Dragster 800 stands out for more peak power and lighter kerb weight. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All BMW F 800R years All MV Agusta Dragster 800 years
Build your own comparison →