2011 Honda CBR 600F vs 2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2011 Honda CBR 600F 2011 Honda CBR 600F

Sport

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
102 hp / 75 kW @ 12000 rpm
Top Speed
222.8 km/h
Weight
436.5 pounds
2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750 2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750

Sport

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
110.3 kW / 148 hp @ 12800 rpm
Top Speed
270.7 km/h / 168 mph
Weight
418.9 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Comments-Italian brand.
Year20112012
ColoursBlack/yellowBlack, Blue/White
Make ModelHonda CBR 600FSuzuki GSX-R 750
Warranty-1 Year Limited Warranty
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)135 mm130 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)5.3 inches5.1 inches
Seat Height805 mm / 31.9 in810 mm / 31.8 in.
Wheelbase1386 mm / 54.9 in1390 mm / 54.7 in.
Ground Clearance135 mm / 5.3 in130 mm / 5.1 in
Height1135 mm / 44.6 in1125 mm / 44.6 in.
Length2060 mm / 81.1 in2040 mm / 80.4 in.
Width685 mm / 26.9 in715 mm / 28.5 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight170 kg / 370 lbs156 kg / 344 lbs
Fuel Capacity18 Litres / 4.2 gal17 Litres / 4.5 US gal / 3.7 Imp gal
Wet Weight193 kg / 425.5 lbs190 kg / 418 lbs
Performance
Mods from previous modelAlso called USHighland 507 ATX QuadRacer.-
Top Speed 222.8 km/h270.7 km/h / 168 mph
Acceleration (0-100 km/h)-3.2 sec
Max Power102 hp / 75 kW @ 12000 rpm110.3 kW / 148 hp @ 12800 rpm
Max Torque6.5 m-kg / 63.5 Nm @ 10500 rpm86.3 Nm / 8.8 kgf-m / 64 ft-lb @ 11200 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.5909 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile 11.7 sec 10.7 sec
Top Gear Acceleration-4.5 sec
Engine
Fuel ControlDOHCDOHC
Engine TypeIn-line four, four-strokeIn-line four, four-stroke
Displacement599 cc / 36.5 cu-in749 c / 45.7 cub. in.
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Fuel SystemInjectionInjection
Bore x Stroke67 x 42,5 mm70 x 48.7 mm
Compression Ratio12.0:112.5:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid. High capacity large trapezoidal-shaped radiator which includes compact cooling fan assembly designed for improved air flow.
Emissions-Euro 3.
Engine LubricationWet sumpWet sump
Engine Oil Specification-Synthetic,10W/40
Exhaust-3-way catalytic converter with oxygen sensor.
Fuel Consumption 19.8 km/it5.5 l/100 km / 18.3 km/l / 43 US mpg / 51 Imp mpg
Fuel InductionPGM-FI electronic fuel injection. 36mm Throttle BoreNew 32 bit ECM features 1024 kilobytes of ROM for maximum engine performance working in conjunction with the new S-DMS engine management system
Fuel Reserve4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons4.50 litres / 1.19 gallons
IgnitionComputer-controlled digital transistorised with electronic advance Digital DC-CDI
LubricationWet sumpWet sump
Spark Plug-NGK, CR9E
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multiplate with coil springsWet, multiple discs
Final DriveChainChain, RK525ROZ5Y, 116 links
Gear Ratios1st 2.750 (33/12) / 2nd 1.938 (31/16) /3rd 1.556 (28/18) / 4th 1.348 (31/23) 5th 1.208 (29/24) /6th 1.095 (23/21)1st 2.79 / 2nd 2.05 / 3rd 1.71 / 4th 1.50 / 5th 1.35 / 6th 1.20:1
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary Drive-RK525ROZ5Y, 116 links chain
Transmission / Drive6 Speed 6 Speed, constant mesh
Chassis
Frame TypeMono-backbone; rectangular-section gravity die-cast aluminiumUltra-lightweight frame built entirely of aluminum alloy castings.
Suspension - Front41mm inverted telescopic fork,Showa inverted 41 mm cartridge front forks fully adjustable for high and low speed compression, spring preload, and rebound damping
Suspension - RearMonoshock damper with 7-step adjustable preload,Showa 41mm aluminum alloy rear shock with a 16mm rod diameter are fully adjustable for high and low speed compression, spring preload and rebound damping
Rake24°23.8°
Trail96.5 mm / 3.8 in97 mm / 3.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in120 mm / 4.7 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear128 mm / 4.7 in130 mm / 5.1 in.
Electrical Systems
Instrumentation-Electronic/analogical rev counter and speedometer with multifunctional LCD display
Lighting system12V; 60/55W low and high headlights-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)11.7 inches12.2 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)296 mm310 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.4 inches8.7 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)240 mm220 mm
Brakes - Front2x 296mm discs 2 piston caliper2 x 310 mm Discs, radial-mount opposed-four-piston Brembo 4 piston monoblock calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 240mm disc 1 piston calipersSingle 220 mm disc, Nissin single piston caliper
Rims-Excel spoke rims with aluminium channel
Rims - Front-3.8 x 17
Rims - Rear-5.5 x 17
Tyres - Front120/70ZR17120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear180/55ZR17180/55 ZR17
Wheels-Aluminum, 3 spoke

Verdict

Winner on specs

2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750

The 2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750 edges out the 2011 Honda CBR 600F thanks to its dual front discs and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2011 Honda CBR 600F - Advantages

  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.

2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750 - Advantages

  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • Larger displacement: 749 cc vs 599 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.

2011 Honda CBR 600F vs 2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750 - FAQs

What is the displacement difference between the 2011 Honda CBR 600F and 2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750?
Both bikes share the same engine layout, but the 2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750 has a larger displacement at 749 cc compared to 599 cc for the 2011 Honda CBR 600F. The extra 150 cc gives the 2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750 a broader torque spread and more low-end pull, while the 2011 Honda CBR 600F trades some outright displacement for a lighter, more nimble package.
Which should I buy, the 2011 Honda CBR 600F or the 2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750?
Both are strong choices. The 2011 Honda CBR 600F has the edge in fuel injection, while the 2012 Suzuki GSX-R 750 stands out for dual front discs and larger displacement. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.