2013 Honda CRF 250L vs 2013 KTM 300 EXC

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles

Differences only

2013 Honda CRF 250L

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine

Single cylinder, four-stroke

Power

N/A

Top Speed

N/A

Weight

317.5 pounds

2013 KTM 300 EXC

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine

Single cylinder, two-stroke

Power

N/A

Top Speed

N/A

Weight

229.3 pounds

Full Specifications

Differs Same

General
Comments	Model ID: CRF150RB	-
Colours	Red/white	Orange/black
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)	10.0 inches	14.0 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)	255 mm	355 mm
Seat Height	875 mm / 34.4 in.	960 mm / 37.8 in.
Wheelbase	1,445 mm / 56.9 in.	1,482 mm / 58.3 in.
Height	1,195 mm / 47.0 in.	1,140 mm / 44.9 in.
Length	2,195 mm / 86.4 in.	2,090 mm / 82.3 in.
Width	815 mm / 32.1 in.	830 mm / 32.7 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)	1.80 litres	-
Oil Capacity (Quarts)	0.12 quarts	-
Dry Weight	-	104 kg / 229.3 lbs
Fuel Capacity	7.70 litres / 2.03 gallons	9.50 litres / 2.51 gallons
Wet Weight	144.0 kg / 317.5 lbs	-
Performance
Max Torque	22.00 Nm (2.2 kgf-m or 16.2 ft.lbs) @ 7000	9.20 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000 Revolutions
Power-to-Weight Ratio	-	0.0815 HP/kg
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)	3.0 x 2.2 inches	2.8 x 2.8 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)	76.0 x 55.0 mm	72.0 x 72.0 mm
CO2	72.4 CO	-
Displacement (cc)	250.00 cc	293.00 cc
Displacement (ci)	15.26 cubic inches	17.88 cubic inches
Engine Type	Single cylinder, four-stroke	Single cylinder, two-stroke
Fuel Control	DOHC	Single Overhead Cams (SOHC)
Engine Detail	-	Reed intake.
Fuel System	Injection. Programmed fuel injection system (PGM-FI)	Carburettor
Compression Ratio	10.7:1	10.6:1
Emissions	Consult owners manual for optional racing parts.	-
Fuel Consumption	3.12 litres/100 km (32.1 km/l or 75.39 mpg)	-
Ignition	Full-transistor battery ignition	Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment, type Kokusan
Starter	Electric	Electric & kick
Valve System	4	2
Drivetrain
Clutch	Wet multiplate with coil springs	Wet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated
Final Drive	Chain	Chain
Gearbox	6-speed	6-speed
Primary Drive	Constant mesh	14:50 (13:50). Primary drive: 26:72.
Chassis
Frame Type	Semi-double cradle. Swing arm: Rear wheel travel.	Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing
Suspension - Front	Telescopic (Inverted) 43mm diameter slide pipe	WP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PA
Suspension - Rear	Swing arm (Pro-link suspension system) 40mm diameter cylinder	WP ?Suspension PDS 5018 DCC
Rake	27.0°	26.5°
Trail	113 mm / 4.4 in.	-
Wheel Travel - Front	61 mm / 2.4 in.	300 mm / 11.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear	282 mm / 11.1 in.	335 mm / 13.2 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)	256 mm	280 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)	10.1 inches	11.0 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)	8.7 inches	9.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)	220 mm	240 mm
Brakes - Front	Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers.	Single disc
Brakes - Rear	Single disc. Hydraulic. Single-piston caliper.	Single disc
Rims	Brakes Front	-
Tyres - Front	3.00-21	100/80-17
Tyres - Rear	120/80-P18	110/80-17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 KTM 300 EXC

The 2013 KTM 300 EXC edges out the 2013 Honda CRF 250L thanks to its greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 Honda CRF 250L - Advantages

Lower seat height: 875 mm vs 960 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.

2013 KTM 300 EXC - Advantages

More ground clearance: 355 mm vs 255 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 282 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 61 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 Honda CRF 250L vs 2013 KTM 300 EXC - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Honda CRF 250L and 2013 KTM 300 EXC?

The 2013 Honda CRF 250L uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2013 KTM 300 EXC is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2013 Honda CRF 250L is a four-stroke engine while the 2013 KTM 300 EXC runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Honda CRF 250L or the 2013 KTM 300 EXC?

The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the lower seat at 875 mm, making it more accessible. The 2013 KTM 300 EXC sits higher at 960 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.

Which should I buy, the 2013 Honda CRF 250L or the 2013 KTM 300 EXC?

Both are strong choices. The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the edge in lower seat height and fuel injection, while the 2013 KTM 300 EXC stands out for greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Honda CRF 250L years All KTM 300 EXC years

Build your own comparison →