2013 Honda CRF 250L vs 2014 KTM 300 XC-W

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 Honda CRF 250L 2013 Honda CRF 250L

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
317.5 pounds
2014 KTM 300 XC-W 2014 KTM 300 XC-W

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
45.1 km/h / 28.0 mph
Weight
246.9 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsModel ID: CRF150RBGerman brand.
ColoursRed/whiteOrange/gray
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)255 mm355 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)10.0 inches14.0 inches
Seat Height875 mm / 34.4 in.960 mm / 37.8 in.
Wheelbase1,445 mm / 56.9 in.1,482 mm / 58.3 in.
Height1,195 mm / 47.0 in.1,120 mm / 44.1 in.
Length2,195 mm / 86.4 in.2,120 mm / 83.5 in.
Width815 mm / 32.1 in.840 mm / 33.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (Quarts)0.12 quarts-
Oil Capacity (l)1.80 litres-
Dry Weight-102.1 kg / 225.1 lbs
Fuel Capacity7.70 litres / 2.03 gallons10.00 litres / 2.64 gallons
Wet Weight144.0 kg / 317.5 lbs112.0 kg / 246.9 lbs
Performance
Top Speed-45.1 km/h / 28.0 mph
Max Torque22.00 Nm (2.2 kgf-m or 16.2 ft.lbs) @ 70001.00 Nm (0.1 kgf-m or 0.7 ft.lbs)
Engine
Bore x Stroke (mm)76.0 x 55.0 mm72.0 x 72.0 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.0 x 2.2 inches2.8 x 2.8 inches
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Displacement (cc)250.00 cc293.20 cc
Displacement (ci)15.26 cubic inches17.89 cubic inches
Fuel ControlDOHC-
CO272.4 CO-
Engine Detail-Reed intake.
Fuel SystemInjection. Programmed fuel injection system (PGM-FI)Carburettor
Compression Ratio10.7:1-
EmissionsConsult owners manual for optional racing parts.Euro 2
Engine Lubrication-Forced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps
Exhaust-Stainless steel exhaust
Fuel Consumption3.12 litres/100 km (32.1 km/l or 75.39 mpg)-
IgnitionFull-transistor battery ignitionContactless controlled fully electronic ignition with digital ignition adjustment, type Kokusan
StarterElectricElectric & kick
Valve System4-
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multiplate with coil springsMultidisc clutch DDS in oil bath/hydraulically activated
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary DriveConstant mesh5/8 x 1/4
Chassis
Frame TypeSemi-double cradle. Swing arm: Rear wheel travel.Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing
Suspension - FrontTelescopic (Inverted) 43mm diameter slide pipeWP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PA
Suspension - RearSwing arm (Pro-link suspension system) 40mm diameter cylinderWP ?Suspension PDS 5018 DCC
Rake27.0°26.5°
Trail113 mm / 4.4 in.-
Wheel Travel - Front61 mm / 2.4 in.300 mm / 11.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear282 mm / 11.1 in.317 mm / 12.5 in.
Electrical Systems
Instrumentation-Digital cockpit
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches8.7 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)256 mm260 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.1 inches10.2 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm220 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers.Single disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Hydraulic. Single-piston caliper.Single disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings
RimsBrakes Front-
Tyres - Front3.00-21110/70-17
Tyres - Rear120/80-P18130/70-17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2014 KTM 300 XC-W

The 2014 KTM 300 XC-W edges out the 2013 Honda CRF 250L thanks to its greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 Honda CRF 250L - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 875 mm vs 960 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.

2014 KTM 300 XC-W - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 355 mm vs 255 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 317 mm vs 282 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 61 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 Honda CRF 250L vs 2014 KTM 300 XC-W - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Honda CRF 250L and 2014 KTM 300 XC-W?
The 2013 Honda CRF 250L uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2014 KTM 300 XC-W is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2013 Honda CRF 250L is a four-stroke engine while the 2014 KTM 300 XC-W runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Honda CRF 250L or the 2014 KTM 300 XC-W?
The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the lower seat at 875 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 KTM 300 XC-W sits higher at 960 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Honda CRF 250L or the 2014 KTM 300 XC-W?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the edge in lower seat height and fuel injection, while the 2014 KTM 300 XC-W stands out for greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.