2013 Honda CRF 250L vs 2012 Yamaha WR 250F

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 Honda CRF 250L 2013 Honda CRF 250L

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
317.5 pounds
2012 Yamaha WR 250F 2012 Yamaha WR 250F

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Titanium valves
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
256.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsModel ID: CRF150RB-
ColoursRed/whiteBlue/White
Warranty-30 Day (Limited Factory Warranty)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)255 mm366 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)10.0 inches14.4 inches
Seat Height875 mm / 34.4 in.980 mm / 38.6 in.
Wheelbase1,445 mm / 56.9 in.1,481 mm / 58.3 in.
Height1,195 mm / 47.0 in.1,298 mm / 51.1 in.
Length2,195 mm / 86.4 in.2,164 mm / 85.2 in.
Width815 mm / 32.1 in.826 mm / 32.5 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)1.80 litres-
Oil Capacity (Quarts)0.12 quarts-
Fuel Capacity7.70 litres / 2.03 gallons7.95 litres / 2.10 gallons
Wet Weight144.0 kg / 317.5 lbs116.1 kg / 256.0 lbs
Performance
Max Torque22.00 Nm (2.2 kgf-m or 16.2 ft.lbs) @ 7000-
Engine
CO272.4 CO-
Displacement (cc)250.00 cc250.00 cc
Displacement (ci)15.26 cubic inches15.26 cubic inches
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Fuel ControlDOHCDOHC
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.0 x 2.2 inches3.0 x 2.1 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)76.0 x 55.0 mm77.0 x 53.6 mm
Engine Detail-Titanium valves
Fuel SystemInjection. Programmed fuel injection system (PGM-FI)Carburettor. Keihin FCR 37
Compression Ratio10.7:112.5:1
EmissionsConsult owners manual for optional racing parts.-
Engine Lubrication-Wet, multidisc
Fuel Consumption3.12 litres/100 km (32.1 km/l or 75.39 mpg)-
IgnitionFull-transistor battery ignitionCDI
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System45
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multiplate with coil springsWet multiplate
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed5-speed
Primary DriveConstant meshConstant-mesh 5-speed
Chassis
Frame TypeSemi-double cradle. Swing arm: Rear wheel travel.-
Suspension - FrontTelescopic (Inverted) 43mm diameter slide pipeInverted fork
Suspension - RearSwing arm (Pro-link suspension system) 40mm diameter cylinderSingle shock
Rake27.0°-
Trail113 mm / 4.4 in.-
Wheel Travel - Front61 mm / 2.4 in.300 mm / 6.3 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear282 mm / 11.1 in.180 mm / 7.1 in.
Electrical Systems
Lighting system-Dual 30W Krypton multireflector headlights and 21/5W brakelight
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)256 mm250 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm245 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.1 inches9.8 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches9.6 inches
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers.Single disc. Hydraulic
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Hydraulic. Single-piston caliper.Single disc. Hydraulic
RimsBrakes Front-
Tyres - Front3.00-2180/100-21
Tyres - Rear120/80-P18100/100-18

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Honda CRF 250L

The 2013 Honda CRF 250L edges out the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F thanks to its lower seat height, fuel injection and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 Honda CRF 250L - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 875 mm vs 980 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • More rear wheel travel: 282 mm vs 180 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2012 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 366 mm vs 255 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 61 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 Honda CRF 250L vs 2012 Yamaha WR 250F - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Honda CRF 250L or the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F?
The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the lower seat at 875 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F sits higher at 980 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Honda CRF 250L or the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the edge in lower seat height and fuel injection, while the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F stands out for greater ground clearance and higher front wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.