2010 Kawasaki KX65 vs 2013 KTM 65 SX

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2010 Kawasaki KX65 2010 Kawasaki KX65

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
60.0 kg / 132.2 lbs
2013 KTM 65 SX 2013 KTM 65 SX

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
55.5 kg / 122.4 lbs
Full Specifications
General
ColoursLime GreenOrange/black
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)12.0 inches11.0 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)305 mm280 mm
Seat Height759 mm / 29.9 in.750 mm / 29.5 in.
Wheelbase1,120 mm / 44.1 in.1,137 mm / 44.8 in.
Height955 mm / 37.6 in.-
Length1,590 mm / 62.6 in.-
Width759 mm / 29.9 in.-
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight-55.5 kg / 122.4 lbs
Fuel Capacity3.78 litres / 1.00 gallons3.50 litres / 0.92 gallons
Wet Weight60.0 kg / 132.2 lbs-
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)1.8 x 1.6 inches1.8 x 1.6 inches
Displacement (cc)64.70 cc64.85 cc
Displacement (ci)3.95 cubic inches3.96 cubic inches
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Bore x Stroke (mm)44.5 x 41.6 mm45.0 x 40.8 mm
Engine Detail-Reed intake.
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Mikuni VM24SS-
Compression Ratio8.4:1-
Engine Lubrication-Mixture oil lubrication
IgnitionDigital CDIContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment
Starter-Kick
Drivetrain
Clutch-Wet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary Drive-14:48. Primary drive: 23:75 straight cut spur gear.
Chassis
Frame TypeSemi-double-cradle, high-tensile steelCentral tube frame of chrome molybdenum steel tubing, powder-coated
Suspension - Front33mm leading axle conventional fork with four-way rebound damping / 8.3 in.WP ?Suspension USD ?35
Suspension - RearUNI-TRAK single shock system with four-way rebound damping and fully adjustable spring preload / 9.4WP ?Suspension ?3614 BAVP
Rake27.0°25.5°
Wheel Travel - Front-275 mm / 10.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear-272 mm / 10.7 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)-6.3 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)-7.8 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)-198 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)-160 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle discSingle disc. Four-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.
Tyres - Front60/100-14-
Tyres - Rear80/90-12-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2010 Kawasaki KX65

The 2010 Kawasaki KX65 edges out the 2013 KTM 65 SX thanks to its greater ground clearance. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2010 Kawasaki KX65 - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 305 mm vs 280 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.

2013 KTM 65 SX - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2013 KTM 65 SX matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2010 Kawasaki KX65 vs 2013 KTM 65 SX - FAQs

Which should I buy, the 2010 Kawasaki KX65 or the 2013 KTM 65 SX?
Both are strong choices. The 2010 Kawasaki KX65 has the edge in greater ground clearance, while the 2013 KTM 65 SX offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.