MotoSpecs

2014 KTM 200 XC-W vs 2013 Honda CRF 250L

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2014 KTM 200 XC-W 2014 KTM 200 XC-W

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
45.1 km/h / 28.0 mph
Weight
246.9 pounds
2013 Honda CRF 250L 2013 Honda CRF 250L

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
317.5 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsGerman brand.Model ID: CRF150RB
ColoursOrange/blackRed/white
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)355 mm255 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)14.0 inches10.0 inches
Seat Height960 mm / 37.8 in.875 mm / 34.4 in.
Wheelbase1,471 mm / 57.9 in.1,445 mm / 56.9 in.
Height1,120 mm / 44.1 in.1,195 mm / 47.0 in.
Length2,120 mm / 83.5 in.2,195 mm / 86.4 in.
Width840 mm / 33.1 in.815 mm / 32.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-1.80 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.12 quarts
Dry Weight99.5 kg / 219.4 lbs-
Fuel Capacity10.00 litres / 2.64 gallons7.70 litres / 2.03 gallons
Wet Weight112.0 kg / 246.9 lbs144.0 kg / 317.5 lbs
Performance
Top Speed45.1 km/h / 28.0 mph-
Max Torque-22.00 Nm (2.2 kgf-m or 16.2 ft.lbs) @ 7000
Engine
CO2-72.4 CO
Fuel Control-DOHC
Displacement (ci)11.78 cubic inches15.26 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)193.00 cc250.00 cc
Bore x Stroke (mm)64.0 x 60.0 mm76.0 x 55.0 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)2.5 x 2.4 inches3.0 x 2.2 inches
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Engine DetailReed intake.-
Fuel SystemCarburettorInjection. Programmed fuel injection system (PGM-FI)
Compression Ratio-10.7:1
EmissionsEuro 2Consult owners manual for optional racing parts.
ExhaustStainless steel exhaust-
Fuel Consumption-3.12 litres/100 km (32.1 km/l or 75.39 mpg)
IgnitionContactless controlled fully electronic ignition with digital ignition adjustment, type KokusanFull-transistor battery ignition
StarterElectric & kickElectric
Valve System-4
Drivetrain
ClutchMultidisc clutch in oil bath/hydraulically activatedWet multiplate with coil springs
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary Drive5/8 x 1/4Constant mesh
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubingSemi-double cradle. Swing arm: Rear wheel travel.
Suspension - FrontWP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PATelescopic (Inverted) 43mm diameter slide pipe
Suspension - RearWP ?Suspension PDS 5018 DCCSwing arm (Pro-link suspension system) 40mm diameter cylinder
Rake26.5°27.0°
Trail-113 mm / 4.4 in.
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in.61 mm / 2.4 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear335 mm / 13.2 in.282 mm / 11.1 in.
Electrical Systems
InstrumentationDigital cockpit-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm220 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.2 inches10.1 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)260 mm256 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches8.7 inches
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearingsSingle disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearingsSingle disc. Hydraulic. Single-piston caliper.
Rims-Brakes Front
Tyres - Front110/70-173.00-21
Tyres - Rear130/70-17120/80-P18

Verdict

Winner on specs

2014 KTM 200 XC-W

The 2014 KTM 200 XC-W edges out the 2013 Honda CRF 250L thanks to its greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2014 KTM 200 XC-W - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 355 mm vs 255 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 282 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 61 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 Honda CRF 250L - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 875 mm vs 960 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.

2014 KTM 200 XC-W vs 2013 Honda CRF 250L - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W and 2013 Honda CRF 250L?
The 2014 KTM 200 XC-W uses Single cylinder, two-stroke, while the 2013 Honda CRF 250L is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W is a two-stroke engine while the 2013 Honda CRF 250L runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W or the 2013 Honda CRF 250L?
The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the lower seat at 875 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 KTM 200 XC-W sits higher at 960 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W or the 2013 Honda CRF 250L?
Both are strong choices. The 2014 KTM 200 XC-W has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2013 Honda CRF 250L stands out for lower seat height and fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All KTM 200 XC-W years All Honda CRF 250L years
Build your own comparison →