2016 KTM 390 Duke vs 2020 BMW G 310R

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2016 KTM 390 Duke 2016 KTM 390 Duke

Sport

Engine
Four stroke, single cylinder, DOHC with finger followers, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
32 kW / 43.5 hp @ 9500 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
139 kg / 306 lbs
2020 BMW G 310R 2020 BMW G 310R

Sport

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
25 kW / 34 hp @ 9500 rpm
Top Speed
88.9 mph
Weight
158.5 kg / 349 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year2015 - 162020
Colours-HP Motorsport, Cosmic Black, Racing Red
Make ModelKTM 390 DukeBMW G 310R
Dimensions
Seat Height800 mm / 31.4 in785 mm / 30.9 in
Wheelbase1367 mm / 53.8 in1374 mm / 54.1 in
Ground Clearance172 mm / 6.8 in-
Height-1080 mm / 42.5 in.
Length-1988 mm / 78.3 in
Width-896 mm / 35.3 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight139 kg / 306 lbs158.5 kg / 349.4 lbs
Fuel Capacity11 L / 2.9 US gal / 2.4 Imp gal11 Litres / 2.9 US gal
Maximum Load / GVWR335 kg / 739 lbs-
Oil Capacity1.6 L / 1.7 US qt / 1.4 Imp qt, SAE 15W/50-
Wet Weight-158.5 kg / 349 lbs
Performance
Top Speed-143.0 km/h / 88.9 mph
Max Power32 kW / 43.5 hp @ 9500 rpm25 kW / 34 hp @ 9500 rpm
Max Torque35.3 Nm / 3.6 kg-m / 26 ft-lb @7000rpm28 Nm / 20.7 ft-lb @ 7500 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.2115 HP/kg
Engine
Fuel Control-Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)
Engine Type-Single cylinder, four-stroke
CO2-77.3 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission)
Displacement373.4 cc / 22.7 cu-in313 cc / 19.1 cu in
Engine DetailFour stroke, single cylinder, DOHC with finger followers, 4 valves per cylinderSingle cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves
Fuel System-Injection
Bore x Stroke89 x 60 mm80 x 62 mm
Compression Ratio12.8:110.6:1
Cooling SystemLiquid CooledLiquid Cooled
Emissions-Euro 4
Exhaust valve diameter-27.2 mm
Fuel Consumption-3.33 litres/100 km (30.0 km/l or 70.64 mpg)
Fuel InductionBosch electronically controlled injectionBMS-E2
Fuel Reserve1.5 L / 1.6 US qt / 1.3 Imp qt-
IgnitionContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment-
LubricationForced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps-
Spark PlugBosch VR 5 NE-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve Diameter (Intake)-33.5 mm
EV Specifics
Battery CapacityFTZ-9, 12V 8Ah, maintenance free12V, 8 Ah
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulicsWet multi-plate
Final DriveChain 5/8 x 1/4" X RingChain, O-ring
Final Drive Ratio15:45-
Gear Ratios1st 12:32 / 2nd 14:26 / 3rd 19:27 / 4th 21:24 / t5th 23:22 / 6th 25:211st 3.000 / 2 nd 2.063 / 3rd 1.588 / 4th 10286 / 5th 1.095 / 6th 0.955:1
Primary Drive Ratios30:80 3.083:1
Transmission / Drive6 Speed, claw shifted6-Speed, constant-mesh
Chassis
Frame TypeSteel trellisTubular steel frame in grid structure with bolt-on rear frame
Suspension - FrontWP inverted fork ø 43 mm41mm Telescopic fork
Suspension - RearWP monoshockAluminium swinging arm in conjunction with a directly mounted spring strut
Steering Head Angle65° 64.9°
Trail100 mm / 3.8 in102.3 mm / 4.02 in
Wheel Travel - Front150 mm / 5.9 in140 mm / 5.5 in
Wheel Travel - Rear150 mm / 5.9 in131 mm / 5.5 in
Electrical Systems
Alternator-330W
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - FrontSingle 300 mm disc, 4 piston radial caliperSingle 300mm disc
Brakes - RearSingle 230 mm disc, 1 piston floating caliperSingle 240mm disc
ABS-Standard
Rims - Front-3.0 x 17
Rims - Rear-4.0 x 17
Tyres - Front110/70 - ZR17 M/C 54W TL, Metzeler SPORTEC MS110/70 R17
Tyres - Rear150/70 - ZR17 M/C 66W TL, Metzeler SPORTEC MS150/60 R17
Wheels-5-Spoke, light alloy die-cast

Verdict

Winner on specs

2016 KTM 390 Duke

The 2016 KTM 390 Duke edges out the 2020 BMW G 310R thanks to its more peak power, fuel injection, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2016 KTM 390 Duke - Advantages

  • More power: Produces 32 kW vs 25 kW - a meaningful performance advantage.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • More rear wheel travel: 150 mm vs 131 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 150 mm vs 140 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2020 BMW G 310R - Advantages

  • Standard ABS: A meaningful safety advantage in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.

2016 KTM 390 Duke vs 2020 BMW G 310R - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2016 KTM 390 Duke and 2020 BMW G 310R?
The 2016 KTM 390 Duke uses Four stroke, single cylinder, DOHC with finger followers, 4 valves per cylinder, while the 2020 BMW G 310R is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke.
Which has more power, the 2016 KTM 390 Duke or the 2020 BMW G 310R?
The 2016 KTM 390 Duke produces more peak power at 32 kW, compared to 25 kW for the 2020 BMW G 310R.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2016 KTM 390 Duke or the 2020 BMW G 310R?
The 2020 BMW G 310R has the lower seat at 785 mm, making it more accessible. The 2016 KTM 390 Duke sits higher at 800 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Does the 2016 KTM 390 Duke or 2020 BMW G 310R have ABS?
The 2020 BMW G 310R is listed with ABS as standard. The 2016 KTM 390 Duke does not list ABS. ABS provides a meaningful safety benefit in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.
Which should I buy, the 2016 KTM 390 Duke or the 2020 BMW G 310R?
Both are strong choices. The 2016 KTM 390 Duke has the edge in more peak power and fuel injection, while the 2020 BMW G 310R stands out for standard ABS. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.