2013 KTM 65 SX vs 2010 Kawasaki KX85

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 KTM 65 SX 2013 KTM 65 SX

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
55.5 kg / 122.4 lbs
2010 Kawasaki KX85 2010 Kawasaki KX85

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
69.0 kg / 152.1 lbs
Full Specifications
General
ColoursOrange/blackLime Green/Ebony
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)280 mm340 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)11.0 inches13.4 inches
Seat Height750 mm / 29.5 in.841 mm / 33.1 in.
Wheelbase1,137 mm / 44.8 in.1,255 mm / 49.4 in.
Height-1,054 mm / 41.5 in.
Length-1,821 mm / 71.7 in.
Width-734 mm / 28.9 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight55.5 kg / 122.4 lbs-
Fuel Capacity3.50 litres / 0.92 gallons5.67 litres / 1.50 gallons
Wet Weight-69.0 kg / 152.1 lbs
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)1.8 x 1.6 inches1.9 x 1.8 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)45.0 x 40.8 mm48.5 x 45.8 mm
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Displacement (ci)3.96 cubic inches5.13 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)64.85 cc84.00 cc
Engine DetailReed intake.-
Fuel System-Carburettor. Keihin PWK28
Compression Ratio-10.0:1
Engine LubricationMixture oil lubrication-
IgnitionContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustmentDigital CDI
StarterKick-
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated-
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary Drive14:48. Primary drive: 23:75 straight cut spur gear.-
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame of chrome molybdenum steel tubing, powder-coatedHigh-tensile steel perimeter design with subframe member
Suspension - FrontWP ?Suspension USD ?3536mm inverted telescopic cartridge fork with 18-way compression damping / 10.8 in.
Suspension - RearWP ?Suspension ?3614 BAVPUNI-TRAK single-shock system with 4-way compression and 16-way rebound damping, plus adjustable spring preload / 10.8 in.
Rake25.5°27.0°
Wheel Travel - Front275 mm / 10.8 in.-
Wheel Travel - Rear272 mm / 10.7 in.-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)160 mm-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)6.3 inches-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)198 mm-
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)7.8 inches-
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Four-piston calipers.Single disc
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.Single disc
Tyres - Front-70/100-17
Tyres - Rear-90/90-14

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2013 KTM 65 SX and the 2010 Kawasaki KX85 are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2013 KTM 65 SX - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 750 mm vs 841 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2010 Kawasaki KX85 - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 340 mm vs 280 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.

2013 KTM 65 SX vs 2010 Kawasaki KX85 - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 KTM 65 SX or the 2010 Kawasaki KX85?
The 2013 KTM 65 SX has the lower seat at 750 mm, making it more accessible. The 2010 Kawasaki KX85 sits higher at 841 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 KTM 65 SX or the 2010 Kawasaki KX85?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 KTM 65 SX has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2010 Kawasaki KX85 stands out for greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.