MotoSpecs

2006 Suzuki SV 650S vs 2006 Suzuki SV 650S vs 2008 BMW F 800S

Full specifications comparison • 3 motorcycles

Comparing 3 motorcycles
2006 Suzuki SV 650S 2006 Suzuki SV 650S

Naked bike

Engine
V2
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
372.6 pounds
2006 Suzuki SV 650S 2006 Suzuki SV 650S

Sport

Engine
V2
Power
N/A
Top Speed
204.3 km/h / 126.9 mph
Weight
189 kg / 417 lbs
2008 BMW F 800S 2008 BMW F 800S

Sport

Engine
Twin
Power
62.5 kW / 85 hp @ 8000 rpm
Top Speed
219.7 km/h / 136.5 mph
Weight
209 kg / 461 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year2005 - 062008
ColoursBlue, Yellow-
Make ModelSuzuki SV 650SBMW F 800S
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)155 mm-
Ground Clearance (in.)6.1 inches-
Seat Height800 mm / 31.5 in820 mm / 32.3 in (low seat: 790 mm / 31.1 in)
Wheelbase1 430 mm / 56.3 in1466 mm / 57.7 in
Ground Clearance155 mm / 6.1 in-
Height1175 mm / 46.3 in1155 mm / 45.5 in (excl. mirrors)
Length2130 mm / 83.9 in2082 mm / 82 in
Width730 mm / 28.7 in860 mm / 33.9 in (incl. mirrors)
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight169 kg / 372 lbs182 kg / 401 lbs
Fuel Capacity17 Litres / 4.5 US gal / 3.7 Imp gal16 Litres / 4.2 US gal
Oil Capacity2.3 Litres / 2.4 US qt / 2.0 Imp qt-
Wet Weight189 kg / 417 lbs209 kg / 461 lbs
Performance
Top Speed204.3 km/h / 126.9 mph219.7 km/h / 136.5 mph
Braking (60 mph - 0)36 m / 118 ft-
Max Power-62.5 kW / 85 hp @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque64 Nm / 6.53 kg-m / 47.2 lb-ft @ 7200 rpm80 Nm / 59 lb-ft @ 5800 rpm
Standing Start 0-161 km/h8.76 sec-
Standing Start 0-97 km/h3.2 sec-
Standing Start ¼ Mile11.85 sec / 177 km/h / 110 mph12.2 sec
Engine
Displacement (cc)645.00 cc-
Bore x Stroke (mm)81.0 x 62.6 mm-
Displacement (ci)39.36 cubic inches-
Stroke44
Fuel ControlDOHC-
Engine TypeV2Twin
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.2 x 2.5 inches-
Displacement645 cc / 39.4 cu-in798 cc / 47.7 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, 90°-V-twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel SystemInjection. Fuel InjectionInjection. Electronic intake pipe injection / digital engine management (BMS-K)
Bore x Stroke81 x 62.6 mm82 x 75.8 mm
Compression Ratio11.5:112.0:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
Engine LubricationWet Sump-
Engine Oil SpecificationSynthetic, 10W40-
Fuel Consumption4.65 L/100 km / 21.5 km/l / 50.6 US mpg / 60.7 Imp mpg-
Fuel InductionFuel InjectionElectronic intake injection
Fuel Reserve-2.00 litres / 0.53 gallons
IgnitionDigital/TransistorizedKnock control and oxygen sensors
LubricationWet sumpDry sump
Spark PlugNGK, CR8E-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System-4
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity-12V / 14 Ah, maintenance-free
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multiple plate coil springsCable-operated multiplate-plate wet clutch
Final DriveChainBelt drive
Final Drive Ratio45/14 (3.000)-
Gear Ratios1st 32/13 (2.461) / 2nd 32/18 (1.777) / 3rd 29/21 (1.380) / 4th 27/24 (1.125) / 5th 25/26 (0.961) / 6th 23/27 (0.851)1st 2.46 / 2nd 1.75 / 3rd 1.38 / 4th 1.17 / 5th 1.04 / 6th 0.96:1
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary Drive Ratios34/71 (2.088)-
Transmission / Drive6 Speed6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypePressure cast aluminium alloy diamond trussBridge-type aluminium frame
Suspension - FrontTelescopic 41 mm, coil spring, oil damped, fully adjustable preload43mm Telescopic forks
Suspension - RearKYB single shock, adjustable spring preloadDie-cast aluminium single sided swinging arm with rear wheal axle and eccentric adjustment, central spring stud , spring pre-loaded hydraulically adjustable to continuously variable levels by means of handwheel, rebound damping adjustable.
Rake25°25.8°
Steering Head Angle-64.2°
Trail102 mm / 4.0 in95 mm / 3.7 in
Wheel Travel - Front130 mm / 5.1 in140 mm / 5.5 in
Wheel Travel - Rear125 mm / 4.7 in140mm / 5.5 in
Electrical Systems
Alternator-Three-phase alternator 400 W
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)-12.6 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)-320 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)-10.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)-265 mm
Brakes - Front2 x 290 mm Discs, 2 piston calipers2 x 320mm discs, 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 240 mm disc, 2 piston caliperSingle 265 mm disc, 2 piston caliper
Rims - Front-3.50 x 17
Rims - Rear-5.50 x 17
Tyres - Front120/60 ZR17120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear160/60 ZR17180/55 ZR17
Wheels-Cast aluminium
Wheels - Rear4.5 x 17-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2006 Suzuki SV 650S

The 2006 Suzuki SV 650S edges out the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S thanks to its higher torque, higher rear wheel travel, higher front wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2006 Suzuki SV 650S - Advantages

  • Lighter: 189 kg vs 209 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Lower seat height: 800 mm vs 820 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2006 Suzuki SV 650S - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 80 Nm vs 64 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Larger displacement: 798 cc vs 645 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More rear wheel travel: 140mm vs 125 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 140 mm vs 130 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2006 Suzuki SV 650S vs 2006 Suzuki SV 650S - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S and 2006 Suzuki SV 650S?
The 2006 Suzuki SV 650S uses V2, while the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S is powered by Twin.
Which is lighter, the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S or the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S?
The 2006 Suzuki SV 650S is lighter at 189 kg compared to 209 kg for the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S - a difference of 20 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S or the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S?
The 2006 Suzuki SV 650S has the lower seat at 800 mm, making it more accessible. The 2006 Suzuki SV 650S sits higher at 820 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S or the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S?
Both are strong choices. The 2006 Suzuki SV 650S has the edge in lighter kerb weight and lower seat height, while the 2006 Suzuki SV 650S stands out for higher torque and higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Suzuki SV 650S years All Suzuki SV 650S years All BMW F 800S years
Build your own comparison →