2007 Suzuki SV 650S vs 2009 Ducati Monster 696
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | Blue, Red | Red (red/black), Matte Black (black/black), White (black/black) |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 155 mm | - |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 6.1 inches | - |
| Seat Height | 800 mm / 31.5 in. | 770 mm / 30.3 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,430 mm / 56.3 in. | 1,450 mm / 57.1 in. |
| Height | 1,170 mm / 46.1 in. | - |
| Length | 2,085 mm / 82.1 in. | - |
| Width | 730 mm / 28.7 in. | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 169 kg / 372.6 lbs | 161 kg / 354.9 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.00 litres / 4.49 gallons | 15.00 litres / 3.96 gallons |
| Performance |
| Max Torque | - | 50.60 Nm (5.2 kgf-m or 37.3 ft.lbs) |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | - | 0.4898 HP/kg |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.2 x 2.5 inches | 3.5 x 2.3 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 81.0 x 62.6 mm | 88.0 x 57.2 mm |
| Displacement (ci) | 39.36 cubic inches | 42.47 cubic inches |
| Engine Type | V2 | V2, four-stroke |
| Fuel Control | DOHC | Desmodromic valve control |
| Stroke | 4 | - |
| Displacement (cc) | 645.00 cc | 696.00 cc |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection. Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle body |
| Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.7:1 |
| Engine Lubrication | Wet Sump | - |
| Exhaust | - | 2 aluminium mufflers |
| Ignition | Digital/Transistorized | - |
| Starter | - | Electric |
| Valve System | - | 2 |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | APTC wet multiplate with hydraulic control |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Tubular steel trellis frame |
| Suspension - Front | Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped, fully adjustable preload | Showa 43mm upside-down forks |
| Suspension - Rear | Link-type, 7-way adjustable spring preload | Progressive linkage with preload and rebound Sachs adjustable monoshock |
| Rake | - | 24.0° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 120 mm / 4.7 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 148 mm / 5.8 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 9.6 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 12.6 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 320 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 245 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Double disc | Double disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | 120/60-ZR17 | 120/60-ZR17 |
| Tyres - Rear | 160/60-ZR17 | 160/60-ZR17 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2009 Ducati Monster 696
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 edges out the 2007 Suzuki SV 650S thanks to its lower seat height. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2007 Suzuki SV 650S - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 2007 Suzuki SV 650S matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2009 Ducati Monster 696 - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 770 mm vs 800 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2007 Suzuki SV 650S vs 2009 Ducati Monster 696 - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2007 Suzuki SV 650S and 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2007 Suzuki SV 650S uses V2, while the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is powered by V2, four-stroke.
Which is lighter, the 2007 Suzuki SV 650S or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 169 kg for the 2007 Suzuki SV 650S - a difference of 8 kg. This is a small difference unlikely to be a deciding factor in everyday riding.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2007 Suzuki SV 650S or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 has the lower seat at 770 mm, making it more accessible. The 2007 Suzuki SV 650S sits higher at 800 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2007 Suzuki SV 650S or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
Both are strong choices. The 2007 Suzuki SV 650S has its own strengths, while the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.