MotoSpecs

2013 Triumph Daytona 675 vs 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 Triumph Daytona 675 2013 Triumph Daytona 675

Sport

Engine
Four stroke, in-line 3-cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Power
94 kW / 126 hp @ 12500rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
184 kg / 406 lbs
2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6

Sport

Engine
Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Power
94.9 kW / 129 hp @ 14500 rpm
Top Speed
256.9 km/h
Weight
189 kg / 415.8 lbs.
Full Specifications
General
Year20132014
Make ModelTriumph Daytona 675Yamaha YZF 600 R6
Dimensions
Seat Height820 mm / 32.3 in850 mm / 33.5 in
Wheelbase1375 mm / 54.1in1375 mm / 54.1 in
Ground Clearance-130 mm / 5.1 in
Heightwithout mirrors 1112 mm / 43.7 in1095mm / 43.1in
Length2045 mm / 80.4 in2040 mm / 80.3in
Width(handlebars) 695 mm / 27.3 in705 mm / 27.8'in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight167 kg / 368 lbs-
Fuel Capacity17.5 Litres / 4.6 US US gals / 3.8 Imp gal17.5 Liters / 3.7 gal
Oil Capacity3.6 Litres / 1.0 US gal / 0.8 Imp gal-
Wet Weight184 kg / 406 lbs189 kg / 415.8 lbs.
Performance
Top Speed-256.9 km/h
Max Power94 kW / 126 hp @ 12500rpm94.9 kW / 129 hp @ 14500 rpm
Max Torque74 Nm / 7.5 kgf-m / 55 ft/lb @ 11900rpm65.7 Nm / 6.6 kgf-m / 47.7 ft-lb @ 11500 rpm
Standing Start 0-100 km-3.5 sec
Standing Start 0-150 km-5.7 sec
Standing Start 0-200 km-9.7 sec
Standing Start ¼ Mile-11.6 sec
Engine
Displacement675 cc / 41.2 cu in599 cc / 36.5 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, in-line 3-cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Bore x Stroke76 x 49.6 mm67 x 42.5 mm
Compression Ratio12.65:113.1;1
Cooling SystemLiquid-cooledLiquid cooled
ExhaustStainless steel 3 into 1 system with valve in secondary and under engine silencer-
Fuel InductionMultipoint sequential electronic fuel injection with forced air induction and SAI41 mm Mikuni throttle body F.I.
IgnitionDigital - inductive type TCI (Transistor Controlled Ignition)
LubricationWet sumpWet sump
StarterElectricElectric
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-plate, slipper.Multi-plate slipper clutch
Final DriveChainO-ring chain
Gear Ratios-1st 31/12 (2.583) / 2nd 32/16 (2.000) / 3rd 30/18 (1.667) / 4th 26/18 (1.444) / 5th 27/21 (1.286) / 6th 23/20 (1.150)
Transmission / Drive6 Speed 6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeRunning Gear and Displays, Aluminium beam twin spar. Rear - 2 piece high pressure die cast, swingarm braced, twin-sided, aluminium alloy with adjustable pivot positionDeltabox aluminium frame with revised rigidity balance
Suspension - FrontKYB 41mm upside down forks with adjustable preload, rebound and high/low speed compression damping,Fully adjustable 41 mm inverted cartridge fork,
Suspension - RearKYB monoshock with piggy back reservoir adjustable for preload, rebound and high/low speed compression dampingFully adjustable link Monocross; 4-way adjustable,
Rake22.9°24°
Trail87.2 mm97 mm / 3.8 in
Wheel Travel - Front110 mm / 4.9 in115 mm / 4.5 in
Wheel Travel - Rear130 mm / 5.1 in119.4 mm / 4.7 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front2 x 308 mm Discs, 4 piston calipers2x 310mm discs 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 220 mm disc, 1 piston caliperSingle 220mm disc 1 piston caliper
Tyres - Front120/70 ZR 17120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear180/55 ZR 17180/55 ZR17
Wheels - FrontCast aluminium alloy 5-spoke 17 x 3.5in-
Wheels - RearCast aluminium alloy 5-spoke 17 x 5.5in-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Triumph Daytona 675

The 2013 Triumph Daytona 675 edges out the 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6 thanks to its lower seat height, fuel injection, dual front discs and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 Triumph Daytona 675 - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 820 mm vs 850 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • Larger displacement: 675 cc vs 599 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.

2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6 - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 Triumph Daytona 675 vs 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Triumph Daytona 675 and 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6?
The 2013 Triumph Daytona 675 uses Four stroke, in-line 3-cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder., while the 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6 is powered by Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder..
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Triumph Daytona 675 or the 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6?
The 2013 Triumph Daytona 675 has the lower seat at 820 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6 sits higher at 850 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Triumph Daytona 675 or the 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Triumph Daytona 675 has the edge in lower seat height and fuel injection, while the 2014 Yamaha YZF 600 R6 offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Triumph Daytona 675 years All Yamaha YZF 600 R6 years
Build your own comparison →