2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC vs 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC

Super motard

Engine
In-line three, four-stroke
Power
69.1 kW / 93.9 hp @ 9300 rpm
Top Speed
196.3 km/h / 122 mph
Weight
474.0 pounds
2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp

Super motard

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
59.1 hp / 44 kW @ 7750 rpm
Top Speed
173.0 km/h / 107.4 mph
Weight
262.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsWindscreenModel ID: TRX90X
Year20142011 - 12
ColoursBlack, White, Matt Khaki GreenRed, White
Make ModelTriumph Tiger 800 XCHonda XL 700V Transalp
Warranty24 months unlimited milage1 year. Transferable, unlimited mileage limited warranty
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)-7.0 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)-177 mm
StorageTop box, saddle bags-
Seat Height810 mm -830 mm / 31.9"- 32.7" adjustable841 mm / 33.1 in
Wheelbase1530 mm / 60.2"1,515 mm / 59.6 lbs
Ground Clearance-177 mm / 7.0 in
Height1350 mm / 53.1"1305 mm / 51.3 in
Length2215 mm / 87.1"905 mm / 35.6 in
Width795 mm / 31.3"905 mm / 35.6 in
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (Quarts)0.24 quarts-
Oil Capacity (l)3.70 litres-
Dry Weight-214 kg / 472 lbs
Fuel Capacity18.9 Litres / 5.0 US gal / 4.2 Imp gal17.5 Litres / 4.6 US gal
Wet Weight214.5 kg / 473 lbs118.8 kg / 262.0 lbs
Performance
Top Speed196.3 km/h / 122 mph173.0 km/h / 107.4 mph
Max Power69.1 kW / 93.9 hp @ 9300 rpm59.1 hp / 44 kW @ 7750 rpm
Max Torque79 Nm / 8.1 kgf-m / 58 ft.lb @ 7850 rpm60 Nm / 44.3 ft.lbs @ 5500 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.2713 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.2 sec13.5 sec
Engine
CO2133.2 CO-
Engine TypeIn-line three, four-strokeV2, four-stroke
Fuel ControlDOHCSOHC
Displacement799 cc / 48.7 cu-in680.2 cc / 41.5 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.Four stroke, 52o V-Twin, SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel SystemInjection. Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injectionInjection. PGM-FI electronic fuel injection
Bore x Stroke74 x 61.9 mm81 x 66 mm
Compression Ratio12.0:110.0:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
ExhaustStainless Steel, 3 into 1, high-level exhaust-
Fuel Consumption5.3 L/100 km / 18.8 km/l / 44.2 US mpg / 53 Imp mpg19.2 km/lit
Fuel InductionMultipoint sequential electronic fuel injectionElectronic fuel injection 40mm throttle bodies
IgnitionDigital CDIDigital transistorized
LubricationWet sumpWet sump
Spark Plug-NGK, DPR8EA-9
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System4-
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-plateWet, multiple discs, cable operated
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed5-speed
Primary DriveO ring chainO-ring sealed chain
Transmission / Drive6 Speed5 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel trellis frame, twin-sided swingarmAluminium, Trellis frame
Suspension - FrontShowa 45mm upside down forks41 mm leading-axle fork
Suspension - RearShowa monoshock with remote oil reservoir, hydraulically adjustable preload, rebound damping adjustmentPro-Link with adjustable compression damping
Rake23.9°-
SeatOstrich leather seat-
Trail92.4mm / 3.6"-
Wheel Travel - Front220 mm / 8.7"177 mm / 7.9 in
Wheel Travel - Rear215 mm / 8.5"173 mm / 6.8 in
Electrical Systems
InstrumentationLCD multi-functional instrument pack with digital speedometer, trip computer, analogue tachometer, gear position indicator, fuel gauge, service indicator, switchable ABS and clock-
Lighting systemXenon light,-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)308 mm256 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.1 inches10.1 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.0 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)255 mm240 mm
Brakes - Front2 x 308mm floating discs, Nissin 2-piston floating caliber (Switchable ABS available), Nissin front brake master cylinder, 14mm diameter2x 256 mm discs 2 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 255mm disc, Nissin single-piston floating caliber (Switchable ABS available)Single 240 mm disc 1 piston caliper
RimsChrome wheels with transparent acrylic spokes-
Tyres - Front90/90 ZR21100/90 -19
Tyres - Rear150/70 ZR17130/80 -17
Wheels - Front2.50 x 21" Cast aluminium rim, 36 spoke-
Wheels - Rear4.25 x 17" Cast aluminium rim, 32 spoke-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC

The 2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC edges out the 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp thanks to its higher torque, lower seat height, dual front discs, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 79 Nm vs 60 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Lower seat height: 810 mm -830 mm vs 841 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More rear wheel travel: 215 mm vs 173 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 220 mm vs 177 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC vs 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC and 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp?
The 2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC uses In-line three, four-stroke, while the 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp is powered by V2, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp?
The 2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC has the lower seat at 810 mm -830 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp sits higher at 841 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp?
Both are strong choices. The 2014 Triumph Tiger 800 XC has the edge in higher torque and lower seat height, while the 2012 Honda XL 700V Transalp offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.