2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC vs 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC

Super motard

Engine
In-line three, four-stroke
Power
70.8 KW / 95 hp @ 9300 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
474.0 pounds
2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto

Super motard

Engine
Four stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valves
Power
55 kW / 74 hp @ 8000 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
145 kg / 319.6 lbs
Full Specifications
General
CommentsWindscreen-
Year20152015 - 16
ColoursBlack, White, Matt Khaki Green-
Make ModelTriumph Tiger 800 XCHusqvarna 701 Supermoto
Warranty24 months unlimited milage-
Dimensions
StorageTop box, saddle bags-
Seat Height845 mm - 865 mm / 33.3 in- 34.1 in adjustable890 mm / 35.0 in
Wheelbase1545 mm / 60.8 in1480 mm ± 15 mm / 58.2 in ± 0.59 in
Ground Clearance-270 mm / 10.6 in
Height1390 mm / 54.7 in (without mirrors)-
Length2215 mm / 87.1in-
Width865 mm / 34.1 in (with handlebars)-
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)3.70 litres-
Oil Capacity (Quarts)0.24 quarts-
Dry Weight215 kg / 474 lbs145 kg / 319.6 lbs
Fuel Capacity19 Litres / 5.0 US gal / 4.2 Imp gal13 Litres / 3.4 US gal
Oil Capacity3.7 L / 0.98 US gal / 0.81 Imp gal-
Wet Weight215.0 kg / 474.0 lbs-
Performance
Max Power70.8 KW / 95 hp @ 9300 rpm55 kW / 74 hp @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque79 Nm / 8.1 kgf-m / 58 ft.lb @ 7850 rpm71 Nm / 52.4 ft-lb @ 6750 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.5000 HP/kg-
Engine
Fuel ControlDouble Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)-
Engine TypeIn-line three, four-stroke-
CO2133.2 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission)-
Displacement799 cc / 48.7 cub in692.7 cc / 42.27 cu in
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.Four stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valves
Fuel SystemInjection. Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection-
Bore x Stroke74 x 61.9 mm105 x 80 mm
Compression Ratio-12.7:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooling
Engine Management-Keihin EMS with Ride By Wire
Engine Oil Specification-Bel Ray, SAE 10W-50
ExhaustStainless Steel, 3 into 1, high-level stainless steel silencerStainless steel silencer with regulated catalytic converter
Fuel Consumption5.74 litres/100 km (17.4 km/l or 40.98 mpg)-
Fuel InductionMultipoint sequential electronic fuel injectionKeihin EMS with RBW
IgnitionDigital CDIDouble ignition
LubricationWet sumpPressure lubrication with 2 oil pumps
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System4-
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity-12V 8.6Ah
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-plateAPTC slipper clutch, hydraulically operated
Final DriveChain, O-ringChain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4
Final Drive Ratio-16:42
Gearbox6-speed-
Primary DriveO ring chain-
Primary Drive Ratios-36:79
Transmission / Drive6 Speed6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel trellis frame, swingarm: Twin-sided, cast aluminum alloyChromium-Molybdenum-Steel trellis frame, powder coated, Subframe Self-supporting polyamide tank
Suspension - FrontShowa 43mm upside down forks48 mm WP-USD split function fork
Suspension - RearShowa monoshock with hydraulically adjustable preloadWP-Monoshock with Pro-Lever linkage
Clamp Offset - Triple-35 mm / 33 mm
Handlebar-Aluminium, tapered, Ø 28/22 mm
Rake24.3°-
Steering Head Angle-63°
Trail95.3 mm / 3.75 in112 mm / 4.4 in
Wheel Travel - Front180 mm / 7.1 in215 mm / 8.4 in
Wheel Travel - Rear170 mm / 6.7 in250 mm / 9.8 in
Electrical Systems
InstrumentationLCD multi-functional instrument pack with digital speedometer, trip computer, analogue tachometer, gear position indicator, fuel gauge, service indicator, switchable ABS and clock-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.0 inches-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)308 mm-
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.1 inches-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)255 mm-
Brakes - Front2 x 308 mm floating discs, Nissin 2-piston sliding caliper, ABS availableSingle 320 mm disc, Brembo four piston, radially bolted caliper
Brakes - RearSingle 255 mm disc, Nissin single-piston sliding caliper, ABS availableSingle 240 mm disc, Brembo single piston, floating caliper
ABS-ABS Bosch 9M+ Two Channel (disengageable, supermoto mode)
Rims32-spoke, aluminium rim-
Tyres - Front90/90 R21120/70 ZR 17
Tyres - Rear150/70 R17160/60 ZR 17
Wheels - Front36-Spoke 21 x 2.5inSpoked wheels with aluminium tubeless rims 3.50 x 17
Wheels - Rear32-Spoke 17 x 4.25inSpoked wheels with aluminium tubeless rims 5.00 x 17

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC and the 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 79 Nm vs 71 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
  • Lower seat height: 845 mm - 865 mm vs 890 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto - Advantages

  • Lighter: 145 kg vs 215 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Standard ABS: A meaningful safety advantage in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.
  • More rear wheel travel: 250 mm vs 170 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 215 mm vs 180 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC vs 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC and 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto?
The 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC uses In-line three, four-stroke, while the 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto is powered by Four stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valves.
Which is lighter, the 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto?
The 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto is lighter at 145 kg compared to 215 kg for the 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC - a difference of 70 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto?
The 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC has the lower seat at 845 mm - 865 mm, making it more accessible. The 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto sits higher at 890 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which has the larger fuel tank, the 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto?
The 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC has the larger tank at approximately 19 litres vs 13 litres for the 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 316-380 km vs 216-260 km between stops.
Does the 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto have ABS?
The 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto is listed with ABS as standard. The 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC does not list ABS. ABS provides a meaningful safety benefit in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.
Which should I buy, the 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto?
Both are strong choices. The 2015 Triumph Tiger 800 XC has the edge in higher torque and larger fuel tank, while the 2016 Husqvarna 701 Supermoto stands out for lighter kerb weight and standard ABS. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.