2016 KTM 390 Duke vs 2014 Honda CBR 300R

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2016 KTM 390 Duke 2016 KTM 390 Duke

Sport

Engine
Four stroke, single cylinder, DOHC with finger followers, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
32 kW / 43.5 hp @ 9500 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
139 kg / 306 lbs
2014 Honda CBR 300R 2014 Honda CBR 300R

Sport

Engine
Twin, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
361.6 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year2015 - 16-
Colours-White/black/red/blue
Make ModelKTM 390 Duke-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)-5.7 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)-145 mm
Seat Height800 mm / 31.4 in785 mm / 30.9 in.
Wheelbase1367 mm / 53.8 in1,380 mm / 54.3 in.
Ground Clearance172 mm / 6.8 in-
Height-1,127 mm / 44.4 in.
Length-2,030 mm / 79.9 in.
Width-710 mm / 27.9 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-1.80 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.12 quarts
Dry Weight139 kg / 306 lbs-
Fuel Capacity11 L / 2.9 US gal / 2.4 Imp gal13.00 litres / 3.43 gallons
Maximum Load / GVWR335 kg / 739 lbs-
Oil Capacity1.6 L / 1.7 US qt / 1.4 Imp qt, SAE 15W/50-
Wet Weight-164.0 kg / 361.6 lbs
Performance
Max Power32 kW / 43.5 hp @ 9500 rpm-
Max Torque35.3 Nm / 3.6 kg-m / 26 ft-lb @7000rpm27.00 Nm (2.8 kgf-m or 19.9 ft.lbs) @ 7250
Engine
Displacement (ci)-17.45 cubic inches
Engine Type-Twin, four-stroke
CO2-76.8 CO
Bore x Stroke (in,)-3.0 x 2.5 inches
Fuel Control-DOHC
Bore x Stroke (mm)-76.0 x 63.0 mm
Displacement (cc)-286.00 cc
Displacement373.4 cc / 22.7 cu-in-
Engine DetailFour stroke, single cylinder, DOHC with finger followers, 4 valves per cylinder-
Fuel System-Injection
Bore x Stroke89 x 60 mm-
Compression Ratio12.8:110.7:1
Cooling SystemLiquid Cooled-
Engine Lubrication-Forced pressure and wet sump
Fuel Consumption-3.31 litres/100 km (30.2 km/l or 71.06 mpg)
Fuel InductionBosch electronically controlled injection-
Fuel Reserve1.5 L / 1.6 US qt / 1.3 Imp qt4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons
IgnitionContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustmentComputer-controlled digital transistorised with electronic advance?
LubricationForced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps-
Spark PlugBosch VR 5 NE-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System-4
EV Specifics
Battery CapacityFTZ-9, 12V 8Ah, maintenance free-
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulicsWet multiplate
Final DriveChain 5/8 x 1/4" X RingChain
Final Drive Ratio15:45-
Gear Ratios1st 12:32 / 2nd 14:26 / 3rd 19:27 / 4th 21:24 / t5th 23:22 / 6th 25:21-
Gearbox-6-speed
Primary Drive-530 O-ring sealed chain
Primary Drive Ratios30:80 -
Transmission / Drive6 Speed, claw shifted-
Chassis
Frame TypeSteel trellisDiamond Steel. Swing arm: 573.6mm.
Suspension - FrontWP inverted fork ø 43 mm37mm conventional fork
Suspension - RearWP monoshockMono-shock, Pro-link
Steering Head Angle65° -
Trail100 mm / 3.8 in98 mm / 3.9 in.
Wheel Travel - Front150 mm / 5.9 in120 mm / 9.7 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear150 mm / 5.9 in120 mm / 4.7 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)-11.7 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)-8.7 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)-220 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)-296 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle 300 mm disc, 4 piston radial caliperSingle disc. Hydraulic.
Brakes - RearSingle 230 mm disc, 1 piston floating caliperSingle disc. Hydraulic.
Rims-Hollow-section 6-spoke cast aluminium
Tyres - Front110/70 - ZR17 M/C 54W TL, Metzeler SPORTEC MS110/70-17
Tyres - Rear150/70 - ZR17 M/C 66W TL, Metzeler SPORTEC MS140/70-17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2016 KTM 390 Duke

The 2016 KTM 390 Duke edges out the 2014 Honda CBR 300R thanks to its liquid cooling, greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2016 KTM 390 Duke - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • More ground clearance: 172 mm vs 145 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 150 mm vs 120 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 150 mm vs 120 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2014 Honda CBR 300R - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2014 Honda CBR 300R matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2016 KTM 390 Duke vs 2014 Honda CBR 300R - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2016 KTM 390 Duke and 2014 Honda CBR 300R?
The 2016 KTM 390 Duke uses Four stroke, single cylinder, DOHC with finger followers, 4 valves per cylinder, while the 2014 Honda CBR 300R is powered by Twin, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2016 KTM 390 Duke or the 2014 Honda CBR 300R?
The 2014 Honda CBR 300R has the lower seat at 785 mm, making it more accessible. The 2016 KTM 390 Duke sits higher at 800 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2016 KTM 390 Duke or the 2014 Honda CBR 300R?
Both are strong choices. The 2016 KTM 390 Duke has the edge in liquid cooling and greater ground clearance, while the 2014 Honda CBR 300R offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.